From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: mripard@kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
airlied@redhat.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
admin@kodeit.net, gargaditya08@proton.me, paul@crapouillou.net,
zack.rusin@broadcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] drm/damage-helper: Do not alter damage clips on modeset, but ignore them
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 09:12:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260507075725.29738-2-tzimmermann@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507075725.29738-1-tzimmermann@suse.de>
User space supplies rectangles for damage clipping in a plane property.
For full mode sets, we still require a full plane update. In this case,
leave the information as-is and set the ignore_damage_clips flag instead.
The damage iterator will later ignore any damage information.
Also fixes a bug where ignore_damage_clips was not cleared across plane
duplications.
Leaving the damage information as-is might be helpful to drivers that
benefit from it even on full modesets (e.g., for cache management). It
will also help with consolidating the damage-handling logic.
Also add a new unit test that evaluates the ignore_damage_clips flag. It
sets two damage clips plus the flag and tests if the reported damage
covers the entire framebuffer.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Fixes: 35ed38d58257 ("drm: Allow drivers to indicate the damage helpers to ignore damage clips")
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.10+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c | 6 ++--
.../gpu/drm/tests/drm_damage_helper_test.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.c
index 76746ad4a1bb..42f25b273dac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.c
@@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ void __drm_atomic_helper_plane_duplicate_state(struct drm_plane *plane,
state->fence = NULL;
state->commit = NULL;
state->fb_damage_clips = NULL;
+ state->ignore_damage_clips = false;
state->color_mgmt_changed = false;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_atomic_helper_plane_duplicate_state);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c
index 1b6850aa1688..85e20f83f757 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c
@@ -78,10 +78,8 @@ void drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_damage(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
if (WARN_ON(!crtc_state))
return;
- if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state)) {
- drm_property_blob_put(plane_state->fb_damage_clips);
- plane_state->fb_damage_clips = NULL;
- }
+ if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state))
+ plane_state->ignore_damage_clips = true;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_damage);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_damage_helper_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_damage_helper_test.c
index 0df2e1a54b0d..64f038a62ffe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_damage_helper_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_damage_helper_test.c
@@ -603,6 +603,33 @@ static void drm_test_damage_iter_damage_not_visible(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, num_hits, 0, "Should not return any damage.");
}
+static void drm_test_damage_iter_damage_ignore(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct drm_damage_mock *mock = test->priv;
+ struct drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter iter;
+ struct drm_property_blob damage_blob;
+ struct drm_mode_rect damage[2];
+ struct drm_rect clip;
+ u32 num_hits = 0;
+
+ set_plane_src(&mock->old_state, 0, 0, 1024 << 16, 768 << 16);
+ set_plane_src(&mock->state, 0, 0, 1024 << 16, 768 << 16);
+ /* 2 damage clips, but ignore them. */
+ set_damage_clip(&damage[0], 20, 30, 200, 180);
+ set_damage_clip(&damage[1], 240, 200, 280, 250);
+ set_damage_blob(&damage_blob, &damage[0], sizeof(damage));
+ set_plane_damage(&mock->state, &damage_blob);
+ mock->state.ignore_damage_clips = true;
+ drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init(&iter, &mock->old_state, &mock->state);
+ drm_atomic_for_each_plane_damage(&iter, &clip) {
+ if (num_hits == 0)
+ check_damage_clip(test, &clip, 0, 0, 1024, 768);
+ num_hits++;
+ }
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, num_hits, 1, "Should return full-framebuffer damage.");
+}
+
static struct kunit_case drm_damage_helper_tests[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_damage_iter_no_damage),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_damage_iter_no_damage_fractional_src),
@@ -625,6 +652,7 @@ static struct kunit_case drm_damage_helper_tests[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_damage_iter_damage_one_outside),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_damage_iter_damage_src_moved),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_damage_iter_damage_not_visible),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_damage_iter_damage_ignore),
{ }
};
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 7:12 [PATCH 00/10] drm: Improve logic behind damage handling Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/atomic-helpers: Evaluate plane damage after atomic_check Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/ingenic: Remove calls to drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_damage() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/damage-helper: Test src coord in drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_damage() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/appletbdrm: Allocate request/response buffers in begin_fb_access Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/damage-helper: Remove old state from drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/damage-helper: Remove old state from drm_atomic_helper_damage_merged() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/atomic_helper: Do not evaluate plane damage before atomic_check Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/damage-helper: Rename state parameters in damage helpers Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 7:12 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/vmwgfx: Remove unused field struct vmwgfx_du_update_plane.old_state Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-07 11:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm: Improve logic behind damage handling Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260507075725.29738-2-tzimmermann@suse.de \
--to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=admin@kodeit.net \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gargaditya08@proton.me \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zack.rusin@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox