Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915: Use sleeping selftests for igt_atomic on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri,  3 Jul 2026 13:32:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703113259.801374-7-dev@lankhorst.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703113259.801374-1-dev@lankhorst.se>

This makes the i915 selftests slightly happier, especially
related to GPU reset.

I believe this may be a better approach than trying to convert
uncore->lock to raw_spinlock

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_atomic.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_atomic.c
index fb506b6990956..8ae39cf570b76 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_atomic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_atomic.c
@@ -39,7 +39,14 @@ static void __hardirq_end(void)
 	local_irq_enable();
 }
 
+static void __maybe_unused __nop(void)
+{}
+
 const struct igt_atomic_section igt_atomic_phases[] = {
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
+	{ "sleeping", __nop, __nop },
+	{ },
+#endif
 	{ "preempt", __preempt_begin, __preempt_end },
 	{ "softirq", __softirq_begin, __softirq_end },
 	{ "hardirq", __hardirq_begin, __hardirq_end },
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-03 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03 11:32 [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/i915: All fixes to make i915 work well with PREEMPT_RT Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-03 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/i915/gt: Use spin_lock_irq() instead of local_irq_disable() + spin_lock() Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-03 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: Drop the irqs_disabled() check Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-03 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915/guc: Consider also RCU depth in busy loop Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-03 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915/gt: Fix selftests on PREEMPT_RT Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-03 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915/gt: Set stop_timeout() correctly on PREEMPT-RT Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-03 11:32 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2026-07-03 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915/gt: Use a spinlock to prevent starvation of irq_work Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-03 12:35 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: All fixes to make i915 work well with PREEMPT_RT. (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260703113259.801374-7-dev@lankhorst.se \
    --to=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox