Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Julia Filipchuk" <julia.filipchuk@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Test GuC v70.74.0 for MTL, DG2
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 19:48:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820194818.A07721F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820193724.3048409-2-julia.filipchuk@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch replaces the major-versioned GuC firmware definitions (`guc_maj`) with exact minor-patch versions (`guc_mmp`) for MTL and DG2, which removes the fallback logic and breaks GuC initialization on standard systems.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Test GuC v70.74.0 for MTL, DG2 ---
commit b7bd03e4f394bb57a559e10784e9ef6e098b9d4e
Author: Julia Filipchuk <julia.filipchuk@intel.com>

drm/i915/guc: Test GuC v70.74.0 for MTL, DG2

This patch updates the GuC firmware version to 70.74.0 for MTL and DG2 platforms.
It replaces the major-versioned definitions with exact minor-patch version definitions.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
> index 7fac97fe30a63..4901cb9cb4ca6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ void intel_uc_fw_change_status(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw,
>   * security fixes, etc. to be enabled.
>   */
>  #define INTEL_GUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(fw_def, guc_maj, guc_mmp) \
> -	fw_def(METEORLAKE,   0, guc_maj(mtl,  70, 53, 0)) \
> -	fw_def(DG2,          0, guc_maj(dg2,  70, 53, 0)) \
> +	fw_def(METEORLAKE,   0, guc_mmp(mtl,  70, 74, 0)) \
> +	fw_def(DG2,          0, guc_mmp(dg2,  70, 74, 0)) \

[Severity: High]
In INTEL_GUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(), does removing the guc_maj fallback entry cause
a regression by breaking GuC initialization on systems where the exact firmware
version 70.74.0 is not present?

To test a new version while maintaining compatibility, should the guc_mmp
definition be added alongside (before) the guc_maj definition, rather than
replacing it?

>  	fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P,  0, guc_maj(adlp, 70, 12, 1)) \
>  	fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P,  0, guc_mmp(adlp, 70, 1, 1)) \

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820193724.3048409-2-julia.filipchuk@intel.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20 19:37 [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Test GuC v70.74.0 for MTL, DG2 Julia Filipchuk
2026-08-20 19:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-20 21:18 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-08-21  2:34 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260820194818.A07721F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=julia.filipchuk@intel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox