From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Igor Paunovic" <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/rockchip: dw_dp: Attach "max bpc" connector property
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 17:50:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909175020.519561F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909173542.14030-4-royalnet026@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] Unconditional connector state allocation causes a memory leak if an HDMI bridge is present in the chain.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `devm_` allocations tied to the component device in `dw_dp_bind` cause resource leaks and permanent driver failure if `bind` fails.
--
commit 47f0f730df97f46871d26a1858e6f2594ea7c383
Author: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
drm/rockchip: dw_dp: Attach "max bpc" connector property
This commit attaches the "max bpc" property to the dw-dp bridge connector
with a range of 6 to 10. It also explicitly creates the connector state
before drm_mode_config_reset() runs, allowing the property to be attached
successfully during driver initialization.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_dp-rockchip.c
> index b23efb153c9e6..8ff27353b1417 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_dp-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_dp-rockchip.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -112,6 +112,32 @@ static int dw_dp_rockchip_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *
> "Failed to init bridge connector\n");
> }
>
> + /*
> + * The components are bound before drm_mode_config_reset() runs, so
> + * the connector has no state yet, but
> + * drm_connector_attach_max_bpc_property() requires one. Create the
> + * connector state first, like drmm_connector_hdmi_init() does.
> + */
> + if (connector->funcs->atomic_create_state) {
> + struct drm_connector_state *state;
> +
> + state = connector->funcs->atomic_create_state(connector);
> + if (IS_ERR(state)) {
> + dw_dp_unbind(dp->base);
> + return PTR_ERR(state);
> + }
> +
> + connector->state = state;
[Severity: Medium]
Does this unconditionally overwrite connector->state?
If the display pipeline contains an HDMI bridge (e.g., a DP-to-HDMI chip),
drm_bridge_connector_init() internally calls drmm_connector_hdmi_init(),
which allocates and assigns connector->state. Overwriting it here seems to
leak the previously allocated drm_connector_state.
> + } else if (connector->funcs->reset) {
> + connector->funcs->reset(connector);
> + }
> +
> + ret = drm_connector_attach_max_bpc_property(connector, 6, 10);
> + if (ret) {
> + dw_dp_unbind(dp->base);
> + return ret;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a regression introduced by this patch, but if this newly added
error path is taken, does it permanently break the driver on deferred probe?
The component bind callback invokes dw_dp_bind() earlier in this function,
which performs devm_ allocations tied to the component device (dev) rather
than the master device. For example:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-dp.c:dw_dp_bind() {
...
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, dp->irq, NULL, dw_dp_irq,
IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), dp);
...
}
Because the component device remains probed even if the bind callback fails,
these devm_ resources are not freed when this error path returns. On a
subsequent bind retry, dw_dp_bind() executes again. Since
devm_request_threaded_irq() does not use IRQF_SHARED, it will return
-EBUSY, permanently failing.
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909163206.36409-1-royalnet026@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 16:31 [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/dp: shared HDR metadata SDP helper, and max bpc for dw-dp Igor Paunovic
2026-09-09 16:37 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-09 17:35 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/dp: Add drm_dp_hdr_metadata_infoframe_sdp_pack() Igor Paunovic
2026-09-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/display: bridge-connector: Preserve max bpc across connector reset Igor Paunovic
2026-09-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/rockchip: dw_dp: Attach "max bpc" connector property Igor Paunovic
2026-09-09 17:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 19:40 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-10 7:16 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-09-10 7:51 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-10 8:16 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-09-10 12:04 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-10 15:11 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for drm/dp: shared HDR metadata SDP helper, and max bpc for dw-dp Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909175020.519561F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=royalnet026@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox