Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "George D. Sworo" <george.d.sworo@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Fail fast when HDCP Type 1 is unsupported via MST
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 04:17:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925041735.66A191F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925035639.2034315-1-george.d.sworo@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] drm/i915: stale cached HDCP capability causes spurious atomic check failures
--

commit 74bd0c52833336220c44be4fec288971d8f48f92
Author: George D. Sworo <george.d.sworo@intel.com>

drm/i915/hdcp: Fail fast when HDCP Type 1 is unsupported via MST

This commit queries the downstream sink through its MST remote AUX channel
during HDCP initialization to cache whether HDCP Type 1 is unsupported. It
then uses this cached value in intel_hdcp_atomic_check() to reject invalid
HDCP Type 1 requests early.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> index e56df337dc6d8..7490fc0fd96ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2421,6 +2441,10 @@ int intel_hdcp_init(struct intel_connector *connector,
>  	if (is_hdcp2_supported(display))
>  		intel_hdcp2_init(connector, dig_port, shim);
>  
> +	/* Cache the remote capability before atomic checks can run. */
> +	connector->mst.type1_unsupported =
> +		intel_hdcp_mst_type1_is_unsupported(connector, shim);

[Severity: Medium]
Does caching this capability during intel_hdcp_init() fail to account for
subsequent monitor hotplugs? If an MST dock is connected with an HDCP 1.x
monitor (or no monitor) initially, connector->mst.type1_unsupported evaluates
to true. If an HDCP 2.x monitor is later hotplugged into the same port, the
stale cached value will remain.

>  	ret = drm_connector_attach_content_protection_property(&connector->base,
>  							       hdcp->hdcp2_supported);
[ ... ]
> @@ -2700,7 +2725,20 @@ void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  		if (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED)
>  			new_state->content_protection =
>  				DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED;
> -		return;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Fail fast if userspace asks for Type1 but neither the platform nor
> +	 * the downstream sink can do HDCP 2.x, instead of only discovering
> +	 * this once intel_hdcp_enable() is reached.
> +	 */
> +	if (new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED &&
> +	    new_state->hdcp_content_type == DRM_MODE_HDCP_CONTENT_TYPE1 &&
> +	    intel_connector->mst.type1_unsupported) {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
> +			    "HDCP Type1 requested without HDCP 2.x support\n");
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}

[Severity: Medium]
Could this lead to spurious rejections of valid HDCP Type 1 requests for
hotplugged monitors? When userspace requests HDCP Type 1 for a newly connected
HDCP 2.x monitor, the atomic check reads the stale cached flag and spuriously
fails the request with -EOPNOTSUPP, preventing the display of premium content.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925035639.2034315-1-george.d.sworo@intel.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-25  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-25  3:56 [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Fail fast when HDCP Type 1 is unsupported via MST George D. Sworo
2026-09-25  4:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-25  4:36 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-25  5:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/hdcp: Fail fast when HDCP Type 1 is unsupported via MST (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-25  5:03 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hdcp: refresh MST Type1 capability per sink George D. Sworo
2026-09-25  5:17 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Fail fast when HDCP Type 1 is unsupported via MST Kandpal, Suraj
2026-09-25  5:26 ` [PATCH v3] " George D. Sworo
2026-09-25  5:28   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2026-09-25  5:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25  6:06 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/hdcp: Fail fast when HDCP Type 1 is unsupported via MST (rev3) Patchwork
2026-09-26  0:06 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260925041735.66A191F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=george.d.sworo@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox