From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Check fb stride against plane max stride
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:17:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2577088.l8ySodvzlW@dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180918140243.12207-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 7:02:43 AM PDT Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> commit 4e0b83a567e2 ("drm/i915: Extract per-platform plane->check()
> functions") removed the plane max stride check for sprite planes.
> I was going to add it back when introducing GTT remapping for the
> display, but after further thought it seems better to re-introduce
> it separately.
>
> So let's add the max stride check back. And let's do it in a nicer
> form than what we had before and do it for all plane types (easy
> now that we have the ->max_stride() plane vfunc).
>
> Only sprite planes really need this for now since primary planes
> are capable of scanning out the current max fb size we allow, and
> cursors have more stringent stride checks elsewhere.
>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Fixes: 4e0b83a567e2 ("drm/i915: Extract per-platform plane->check()
> functions") Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index eb25037d7b38..1eb99d5ec221
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -3151,6 +3151,10 @@ int skl_check_plane_surface(struct intel_plane_state
> *plane_state) plane_state->color_plane[0].stride = intel_fb_pitch(fb, 0,
> rotation); plane_state->color_plane[1].stride = intel_fb_pitch(fb, 1,
> rotation);
>
> + ret = intel_plane_check_stride(plane_state);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (!plane_state->base.visible)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -3286,10 +3290,15 @@ int i9xx_check_plane_surface(struct
> intel_plane_state *plane_state) int src_x = plane_state->base.src.x1 >> 16;
> int src_y = plane_state->base.src.y1 >> 16;
> u32 offset;
> + int ret;
>
> intel_fill_fb_ggtt_view(&plane_state->view, fb, rotation);
> plane_state->color_plane[0].stride = intel_fb_pitch(fb, 0, rotation);
>
Is there a good reason to not inline the code ?
if (color_plane[0].stride > plane->max_stride())
return -EINVAL;
> + ret = intel_plane_check_stride(plane_state);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> intel_add_fb_offsets(&src_x, &src_y, plane_state, 0);
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4)
> @@ -9685,10 +9694,15 @@ static int intel_cursor_check_surface(struct
> intel_plane_state *plane_state) unsigned int rotation =
> plane_state->base.rotation;
> int src_x, src_y;
> u32 offset;
> + int ret;
>
> intel_fill_fb_ggtt_view(&plane_state->view, fb, rotation);
> plane_state->color_plane[0].stride = intel_fb_pitch(fb, 0, rotation);
>
> + ret = intel_plane_check_stride(plane_state);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> src_x = plane_state->base.src_x >> 16;
> src_y = plane_state->base.src_y >> 16;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index bf1c38728a59..a34c2f1f9159 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -2140,6 +2140,7 @@ unsigned int skl_plane_max_stride(struct intel_plane
> *plane, unsigned int rotation);
> int skl_plane_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> +int intel_plane_check_stride(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> int intel_plane_check_src_coordinates(struct intel_plane_state
> *plane_state); int chv_plane_check_rotation(const struct intel_plane_state
> *plane_state);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c index d4c8e10fc90b..5fd2f7bf3927
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,28 @@ void intel_pipe_update_end(struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state) #endif
> }
>
> +int intel_plane_check_stride(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(plane_state->base.plane);
> + const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->base.fb;
> + unsigned int rotation = plane_state->base.rotation;
> + u32 stride, max_stride;
> +
> + /* FIXME other color planes? */
Doesn't the color plane 0 have the max stride always?
> + stride = plane_state->color_plane[0].stride;
> + max_stride = plane->max_stride(plane, fb->format->format,
> + fb->modifier, rotation);
> +
> + if (stride > max_stride) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[FB:%d] stride (%d) exceeds [PLANE:%d:%s] max stride
> (%d)\n", + fb->base.id, stride,
> + plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name, max_stride);
Include the color plane number in the debug print?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int intel_plane_check_src_coordinates(struct intel_plane_state
> *plane_state) {
> const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->base.fb;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-22 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 14:02 [PATCH] drm/i915: Check fb stride against plane max stride Ville Syrjala
2018-09-18 15:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-09-18 17:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-09-21 22:17 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-09-24 13:31 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-09-24 18:56 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2577088.l8ySodvzlW@dk \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@gmail.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox