From: "Ye, Tony" <tony.ye@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Introduce struct class_instance for engines across the uAPI
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 22:17:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25a4b1c4-bd97-41f2-83fc-b97a9ccbd5ff@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f606faa0-8b4f-d2ac-3369-73eddf629e82@linux.intel.com>
On 4/12/2019 8:10 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2019 08:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> SSEU reprogramming of the context introduced the notion of engine class
>> and instance for a forwards compatible method of describing any engine
>> beyond the old execbuf interface. We wish to adopt this class:instance
>> description for more interfaces, so pull it out into a separate type for
>> userspace convenience.
>>
>> References: e46c2e99f600 ("drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration
>> to userspace (Gen11 only)")
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>> Cc: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
>> Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com>
>> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
>> ---
>> Drop the union foible. It's only going to hinder a decision ;)
>> -Chris
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 8 ++++----
>> include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> index 7fc34ab6df87..dd728b26b5aa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> @@ -1386,8 +1386,8 @@ static int set_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(i915,
>> - user_sseu.engine_class,
>> - user_sseu.engine_instance);
>> + user_sseu.engine.engine_class,
>> + user_sseu.engine.engine_instance);
>> if (!engine)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -1626,8 +1626,8 @@ static int get_sseu(struct i915_gem_context
>> *ctx,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(ctx->i915,
>> - user_sseu.engine_class,
>> - user_sseu.engine_instance);
>> + user_sseu.engine.engine_class,
>> + user_sseu.engine.engine_instance);
>> if (!engine)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>> index 52051d24d89d..bbc453b1e50f 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>> @@ -126,6 +126,19 @@ enum drm_i915_gem_engine_class {
>> I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID = -1
>> };
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * There may be more than one engine fulfilling any role within the
>> system.
>> + * Each engine of a class is given a unique instance number and
>> therefore
>> + * any engine can be specified by its class:instance tuplet. APIs
>> that allow
>> + * access to any engine in the system will use struct
>> i915_engine_class_instance
>> + * for this identification.
>> + */
>> +struct i915_engine_class_instance {
>> + __u16 engine_class; /* see enum drm_i915_gem_engine_class */
>> + __u16 engine_instance;
>> +};
>> +
>> /**
>> * DOC: perf_events exposed by i915 through
>> /sys/bus/event_sources/drivers/i915
>> *
>> @@ -1525,8 +1538,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param_sseu {
>> /*
>> * Engine class & instance to be configured or queried.
>> */
>> - __u16 engine_class;
>> - __u16 engine_instance;
>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance engine;
>> /*
>> * Unused for now. Must be cleared to zero.
>>
>
> This will definitely be tidier in the near future (despite a bit of
> ugliness in engine.engine_*). I have also checked that this indeed is
> part of 5.1 which hasn't been shipped yet.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> If we can get an ack from Joonas and Tony, to whom it probably falls
> to do the media-driver change I think we are good to do.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
Acked-by: Tony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com>
Regards, --Tony
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-12 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 6:51 [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce struct class_instance for engines across the uAPI Chris Wilson
2019-04-12 7:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-12 7:07 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-12 7:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-04-12 7:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2019-04-12 12:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-12 14:17 ` Ye, Tony [this message]
2019-04-12 8:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Introduce struct class_instance for engines across the uAPI (rev2) Patchwork
2019-04-12 11:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-04-29 17:08 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce struct class_instance for engines across the uAPI Rodrigo Vivi
2019-05-01 9:50 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25a4b1c4-bd97-41f2-83fc-b97a9ccbd5ff@intel.com \
--to=tony.ye@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox