From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to non blocking CTB send function
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 01:23:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <288500ea-3be3-7499-8a33-0d36d10cb76a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210627231439.138612-6-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 28.06.2021 01:14, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Implement a stall timer which fails H2G CTBs once a period of time
> with no forward progress is reached to prevent deadlock.
>
> v2:
> (Michal)
> - Improve error message in ct_deadlock()
> - Set broken when ct_deadlock() returns true
> - Return -EPIPE on ct_deadlock()
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> index 90ee95a240e8..8f553f7f9619 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> goto err_deregister;
>
> ct->enabled = true;
> + ct->stall_time = KTIME_MAX;
>
> return 0;
>
> @@ -391,9 +392,6 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> u32 *cmds = ctb->cmds;
> unsigned int i;
>
> - if (unlikely(ctb->broken))
> - return -EPIPE;
> -
> if (unlikely(desc->status))
> goto corrupted;
>
> @@ -509,6 +507,25 @@ static int wait_for_ct_request_update(struct ct_request *req, u32 *status)
> return err;
> }
>
> +#define GUC_CTB_TIMEOUT_MS 1500
> +static inline bool ct_deadlocked(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> +{
> + long timeout = GUC_CTB_TIMEOUT_MS;
> + bool ret = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), ct->stall_time) > timeout;
> +
> + if (unlikely(ret)) {
> + struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *send = ct->ctbs.send.desc;
> + struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *recv = ct->ctbs.send.desc;
> +
> + CT_ERROR(ct, "Communication stalled for %lld, desc status=%#x,%#x\n",
nit: missing unit in "stalled for ... ms"
^^^^
> + ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), ct->stall_time),
> + send->status, recv->status);
> + ct->ctbs.send.broken = true;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb, u32 len_dw)
> {
> struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
> @@ -520,6 +537,26 @@ static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb, u32 len_dw)
> return space >= len_dw;
> }
>
> +static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ctb, len_dw))) {
> + if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
> + ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
> +
> + if (unlikely(ct_deadlocked(ct)))
> + return -EPIPE;
> + else
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + ct->stall_time = KTIME_MAX;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> const u32 *action,
> u32 len,
> @@ -530,13 +567,14 @@ static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> u32 fence;
> int ret;
>
> + if (unlikely(ctb->broken))
> + return -EPIPE;
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
>
> - ret = h2g_has_room(ctb, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN);
> - if (unlikely(!ret)) {
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> + ret = has_room_nb(ct, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> goto out;
> - }
>
> fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
> ret = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, flags);
> @@ -571,6 +609,9 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> GEM_BUG_ON(!response_buf && response_buf_size);
> might_sleep();
>
> + if (unlikely(ctb->broken))
> + return -EPIPE;
ok, but likely could be part of ct_can_send/has_room
> +
> /*
> * We use a lazy spin wait loop here as we believe that if the CT
> * buffers are sized correctly the flow control condition should be
> @@ -579,8 +620,13 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> retry:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, flags);
> if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ctb, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN))) {
> + if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
> + ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, flags);
>
> + if (unlikely(ct_deadlocked(ct)))
> + return -EPIPE;
> +
can't we really put all this into one place?
static int ct_can_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw, bool wait)
{
struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
lockdep_assert_held(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
retry:
if (ct->broken)
return -EPIPE;
if (unlikely(!ctb_has_room(ctb, len_dw + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN))) {
if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
if (unlikely(ct_deadlocked(ct)))
return -EPIPE;
if (!wait)
return -EBUSY;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, flags);
...
spin_lock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, flags);
goto retry;
}
ct->stall_time = KTIME_MAX;
return 0;
}
Michal
> if (msleep_interruptible(sleep_period_ms))
> return -EINTR;
> sleep_period_ms = sleep_period_ms << 1;
> @@ -588,6 +634,8 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> goto retry;
> }
>
> + ct->stall_time = KTIME_MAX;
> +
> fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
> request.fence = fence;
> request.status = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> index f6a4d5b33467..c9d6ae7848a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
>
> #include "intel_guc_fwif.h"
>
> @@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ struct intel_guc_ct {
> struct list_head incoming; /* incoming requests */
> struct work_struct worker; /* handler for incoming requests */
> } requests;
> +
> + /** @stall_time: time of first time a CTB submission is stalled */
> + ktime_t stall_time;
> };
>
> void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct *ct);
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-27 23:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] CT changes required for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-06-27 23:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-27 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-06-30 22:52 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-01 0:19 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-06-30 23:23 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2021-07-01 0:36 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for CT changes required for GuC submission Patchwork
2021-06-28 0:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-01 17:15 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 17:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 18:27 ` John Harrison
2021-07-06 22:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] CT changes required for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-07-08 16:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] CT changes required for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-08 16:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=288500ea-3be3-7499-8a33-0d36d10cb76a@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox