From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:00:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3147114d-4b4b-1a42-c40b-8d8be870e633@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210701171550.49353-7-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 7/1/2021 10:15, Matthew Brost wrote:
> CTB writes are now in the path of command submission and should be
> optimized for performance. Rather than reading CTB descriptor values
> (e.g. head, tail) which could result in accesses across the PCIe bus,
> store shadow local copies and only read/write the descriptor values when
> absolutely necessary. Also store the current space in the each channel
> locally.
>
> v2:
> (Michel)
> - Add additional sanity checks for head / tail pointers
> - Use GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN rather than magic 1
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 88 +++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 6 ++
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> index a9cb7b608520..5b8b4ff609e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> @@ -130,6 +130,10 @@ static void guc_ct_buffer_desc_init(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc)
> static void guc_ct_buffer_reset(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb)
> {
> ctb->broken = false;
> + ctb->tail = 0;
> + ctb->head = 0;
> + ctb->space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, ctb->head, ctb->size);
> +
> guc_ct_buffer_desc_init(ctb->desc);
> }
>
> @@ -383,10 +387,8 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> {
> struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
> - u32 head = desc->head;
> - u32 tail = desc->tail;
> + u32 tail = ctb->tail;
> u32 size = ctb->size;
> - u32 used;
> u32 header;
> u32 hxg;
> u32 *cmds = ctb->cmds;
> @@ -395,25 +397,22 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> if (unlikely(desc->status))
> goto corrupted;
>
> - if (unlikely((tail | head) >= size)) {
> + GEM_BUG_ON(tail > size);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GUC
> + if (unlikely(tail != READ_ONCE(desc->tail))) {
> + CT_ERROR(ct, "Tail was modified %u != %u\n",
> + desc->tail, ctb->tail);
> + desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_MISMATCH;
> + goto corrupted;
> + }
> + if (unlikely((desc->tail | desc->head) >= size)) {
> CT_ERROR(ct, "Invalid offsets head=%u tail=%u (size=%u)\n",
> - head, tail, size);
> + desc->head, desc->tail, size);
> desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
> goto corrupted;
> }
> -
> - /*
> - * tail == head condition indicates empty. GuC FW does not support
> - * using up the entire buffer to get tail == head meaning full.
> - */
> - if (tail < head)
> - used = (size - head) + tail;
> - else
> - used = tail - head;
> -
> - /* make sure there is a space including extra dw for the fence */
> - if (unlikely(used + len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN >= size))
> - return -ENOSPC;
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * dw0: CT header (including fence)
> @@ -454,7 +453,9 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> write_barrier(ct);
>
> /* now update descriptor */
> + ctb->tail = tail;
> WRITE_ONCE(desc->tail, tail);
> + ctb->space -= len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN;
>
> return 0;
>
> @@ -470,7 +471,7 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> * @req: pointer to pending request
> * @status: placeholder for status
> *
> - * For each sent request, Guc shall send bac CT response message.
> + * For each sent request, GuC shall send back CT response message.
> * Our message handler will update status of tracked request once
> * response message with given fence is received. Wait here and
> * check for valid response status value.
> @@ -526,24 +527,35 @@ static inline bool ct_deadlocked(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb, u32 len_dw)
> +static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
> {
> - struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
> - u32 head = READ_ONCE(desc->head);
> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> + u32 head;
> u32 space;
>
> - space = CIRC_SPACE(desc->tail, head, ctb->size);
> + if (ctb->space >= len_dw)
> + return true;
> +
> + head = READ_ONCE(ctb->desc->head);
> + if (unlikely(head > ctb->size)) {
> + CT_ERROR(ct, "Corrupted descriptor head=%u tail=%u size=%u\n",
> + ctb->desc->head, ctb->desc->tail, ctb->size);
> + ctb->desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
> + ctb->broken = true;
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, head, ctb->size);
> + ctb->space = space;
>
> return space >= len_dw;
> }
>
> static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
> {
> - struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> -
> lockdep_assert_held(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
>
> - if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ctb, len_dw))) {
> + if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ct, len_dw))) {
> if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
> ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
>
> @@ -613,7 +625,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> */
> retry:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, flags);
> - if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ctb, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN))) {
> + if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ct, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN))) {
> if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
> ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, flags);
> @@ -733,7 +745,7 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
> {
> struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.recv;
> struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
> - u32 head = desc->head;
> + u32 head = ctb->head;
> u32 tail = desc->tail;
> u32 size = ctb->size;
> u32 *cmds = ctb->cmds;
> @@ -748,12 +760,29 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
> if (unlikely(desc->status))
> goto corrupted;
>
> - if (unlikely((tail | head) >= size)) {
> + GEM_BUG_ON(head > size);
Is the BUG_ON necessary given that both options below do the same check
but as a corrupted buffer test (with subsequent recovery by GT reset?)
rather than killing the driver.
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GUC
> + if (unlikely(head != READ_ONCE(desc->head))) {
> + CT_ERROR(ct, "Head was modified %u != %u\n",
> + desc->head, ctb->head);
> + desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_MISMATCH;
> + goto corrupted;
> + }
> + if (unlikely((desc->tail | desc->head) >= size)) {
> + CT_ERROR(ct, "Invalid offsets head=%u tail=%u (size=%u)\n",
> + head, tail, size);
> + desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
> + goto corrupted;
> + }
> +#else
> + if (unlikely((tail | ctb->head) >= size)) {
Could just be 'head' rather than 'ctb->head'.
John.
> CT_ERROR(ct, "Invalid offsets head=%u tail=%u (size=%u)\n",
> head, tail, size);
> desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
> goto corrupted;
> }
> +#endif
>
> /* tail == head condition indicates empty */
> available = tail - head;
> @@ -803,6 +832,7 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
> }
> CT_DEBUG(ct, "received %*ph\n", 4 * len, (*msg)->msg);
>
> + ctb->head = head;
> /* now update descriptor */
> WRITE_ONCE(desc->head, head);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> index bee03794c1eb..edd1bba0445d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ struct intel_guc;
> * @desc: pointer to the buffer descriptor
> * @cmds: pointer to the commands buffer
> * @size: size of the commands buffer in dwords
> + * @head: local shadow copy of head in dwords
> + * @tail: local shadow copy of tail in dwords
> + * @space: local shadow copy of space in dwords
> * @broken: flag to indicate if descriptor data is broken
> */
> struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
> @@ -40,6 +43,9 @@ struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
> struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc;
> u32 *cmds;
> u32 size;
> + u32 tail;
> + u32 head;
> + u32 space;
> bool broken;
> };
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-01 17:15 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] CT changes required for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 17:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 17:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 17:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 17:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 18:12 ` John Harrison
2021-07-06 18:17 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 17:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 18:27 ` John Harrison
2021-07-01 17:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 19:00 ` John Harrison [this message]
2021-07-06 19:12 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-06 19:19 ` John Harrison
2021-07-06 19:33 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-06 21:22 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 22:41 ` John Harrison
2021-07-01 17:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 23:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for CT changes required for GuC submission (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-01 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-01 23:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-02 6:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-08 16:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] CT changes required for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-08 16:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 22:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] CT changes required for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-07-06 22:51 ` John Harrison
2021-07-07 17:50 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-07 18:19 ` John Harrison
2021-07-07 18:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-07 20:21 ` John Harrison
2021-07-07 20:23 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] CT changes required for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-06-27 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3147114d-4b4b-1a42-c40b-8d8be870e633@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox