Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mtl: Print SSEU information of all GTs for debugfs

[Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>]

On 03/11/2023 05:29, Gareth Yu wrote:
> Print another SSEU information addition to the first one.
> 
> Cc : Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
> Cc : Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Cc : Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gareth Yu <gareth.yu@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c   | 13 ++++++++++---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c |  6 +++++-
>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index e9b79c2c37d8..b5914a2c0597 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -63,13 +63,16 @@ static int i915_capabilities(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>   {
>   	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private);
>   	struct drm_printer p = drm_seq_file_printer(m);
> +	struct intel_gt *gt;
> +	unsigned int i;
>   
>   	seq_printf(m, "pch: %d\n", INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915));
>   
>   	intel_device_info_print(INTEL_INFO(i915), RUNTIME_INFO(i915), &p);
>   	intel_display_device_info_print(DISPLAY_INFO(i915), DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915), &p);
>   	i915_print_iommu_status(i915, &p);
> -	intel_gt_info_print(&to_gt(i915)->info, &p);
> +	for_each_gt(gt, i915, i)
> +		intel_gt_info_print(&gt->info, &p);
>   	intel_driver_caps_print(&i915->caps, &p);
>   
>   	kernel_param_lock(THIS_MODULE);
> @@ -783,9 +786,13 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_drop_caches_fops,
>   static int i915_sseu_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>   {
>   	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private);
> -	struct intel_gt *gt = to_gt(i915);
> +	struct intel_gt *gt;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for_each_gt(gt, i915, i)
> +		intel_sseu_status(m, gt);

Don't we have the per GT debugfs directories and files already!?

>   
> -	return intel_sseu_status(m, gt);
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static int i915_forcewake_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index b4e31e59c799..2adc317af944 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -722,9 +722,13 @@ static void err_print_gt_info(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
>   			      struct intel_gt_coredump *gt)
>   {
>   	struct drm_printer p = i915_error_printer(m);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->_gt->i915;
> +	struct intel_gt *gt_n;
> +	unsigned int n;
>   
>   	intel_gt_info_print(&gt->info, &p);
> -	intel_sseu_print_topology(gt->_gt->i915, &gt->info.sseu, &p);
> +	for_each_gt(gt_n, i915, n)
> +		intel_sseu_print_topology(gt_n->i915, &gt_n->info.sseu, &p);

Do we need a consistent story across all error capture? Aka why is sseu 
special.

Also the intel_gt_info_print() above calls intel_sseu_dump so we end up 
with root tile SSEU printed twice?

There possibly was a Jira years ago to do stuff about multi-tile error 
capture but maybe it got lost.

Adding Andi if he has comments.

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   }
>   
>   static void err_print_gt_display(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,