Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Hajda, Andrzej" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: use fetch_and_zero if applicable
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 15:44:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4295836a-2702-c534-c861-f6b5055017f2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tu26ym4x.fsf@intel.com>


On 08/12/2022 15:02, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2022, "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 14:32 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Thu, 08 Dec 2022, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Simplify the code.
>>>
>>> Personally, I absolutely hate fetch_and_zero().
>>>
>>> I understand the point, but there are two main traps:
>>>
>>> First, the name implies atomicity, which there is none at all.
>>>
>>> Second, the name implies it's part of a kernel core header, which it
>>> isn't, and this just amplifies the first point.
>>>
>>> It's surprising and misleading, and those are not things I like about
>>> interfaces in the kernel.
>>>
>>> I would not like to see this proliferate. If fetch_and_zero() was
>>> atomic
>>> *and* part of a core kernel header, it would be a different matter.
>>> But
>>> I don't think that's going to happen, exactly because it won't be
>>> atomic
>>> and the name implies it is.
>>
>> +1 here.
>>
>> Please let's go the other way around and try to kill macros like this.
>>
>> we either kill or we ensure this gets accepted in the core kernel
>> libraries.
> 
> Agreed. I'd be fine with either:
> 
> 1) Get something like this accepted in core kernel headers:
> 
> #define fetch_and_zero(ptr) xchg(ptr, 0)
> 
> 2) Do this in i915:
> 
> @@
> expression E;
> @@
> 
> - fetch_and_zero(E)
> + xchg(E, 0)

We don't need atomic so both solution would IMO be bad.

We could propose __fetch_and_zero and fetch_and_zero, to mimic 
__set_bit/set_bit&co for some consistency in terms of atomic vs 
non-atomic API flavour?

Assuming of course people will think that the long-ish name of the 
utility macro brings an overall positive cost benefit.

Worth a try I guess.

First step I think we need a cocci script for finding the open coded 
"fetch and zero" pattern. Not my forte but I can try if no one else has 
an immediate solution or desire to drive the attempt.

Regards,

Tvrtko

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-08 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-08 11:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: use fetch_and_zero if applicable Andrzej Hajda
2022-12-08 11:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: " Andrzej Hajda
2022-12-08 11:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: " Patchwork
2022-12-08 12:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-12-08 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Jani Nikula
2022-12-08 12:37   ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-08 13:36   ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2022-12-08 15:02     ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-08 15:44       ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2022-12-08 16:26         ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-12-08 15:02     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-12-08 19:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4295836a-2702-c534-c861-f6b5055017f2@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox