From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/4] drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:10:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495a983e-f995-e63c-b63b-9a29daa2edbf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v9883pd9.fsf@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3071 bytes --]
Hi Jani
Am 27.04.21 um 14:04 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
>> V7 of the patchset fixes some bitrot in the intel driver.
>>
>> The pdev field in struct drm_device points to a PCI device structure and
>> goes back to UMS-only days when all DRM drivers were for PCI devices.
>> Meanwhile we also support USB, SPI and platform devices. Each of those
>> uses the generic device stored in struct drm_device.dev.
>>
>> To reduce duplication and remove the special case of PCI, this patchset
>> converts all modesetting drivers from pdev to dev and makes pdev a field
>> for legacy UMS drivers.
>>
>> For PCI devices, the pointer in struct drm_device.dev can be upcasted to
>> struct pci_device; or tested for PCI with dev_is_pci(). In several places
>> the code can use the dev field directly.
>>
>> After converting all drivers and the DRM core, the pdev fields becomes
>> only relevant for legacy drivers. In a later patchset, we may want to
>> convert these as well and remove pdev entirely.
>
> On the series,
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> How should we merge these?
Thanks for the quick reply.
There is another pdev patch that I just sent out. [1] It has to go into
the intel tree. After it landed, I want to get this patchset into
drm-misc-next ASAP. Otherwise, drm-tip would stop building.
This should fix things in the correct order and finally remove pdev for
current drivers.
Best regards
Thomas
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210427110747.2065-1-tzimmermann@suse.de/T/#u
>
>
>
>>
>> v7:
>> * fix instances of pdev that have benn added under i915/
>> v6:
>> * also remove assignment in i915/selftests in later patch (Chris)
>> v5:
>> * remove assignment in later patch (Chris)
>> v4:
>> * merged several patches
>> * moved core changes into separate patch
>> * vmwgfx build fix
>> v3:
>> * merged several patches
>> * fix one pdev reference in nouveau (Jeremy)
>> * rebases
>> v2:
>> * move whitespace fixes into separate patches (Alex, Sam)
>> * move i915 gt/ and gvt/ changes into separate patches (Joonas)
>>
>> Thomas Zimmermann (4):
>> drm/i915/gt: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev
>> drm/i915: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev
>> drm/i915: Don't assign to struct drm_device.pdev
>> drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy section
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 1 -
>> include/drm/drm_device.h | 6 +++---
>> 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-27 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 11:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/4] drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-27 11:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 1/4] drm/i915/gt: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-27 11:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/4] drm/i915: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-27 11:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/4] drm/i915: Don't assign " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-27 11:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 4/4] drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy section Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-27 12:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/4] drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy Jani Nikula
2021-04-27 12:10 ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2021-04-27 13:00 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-27 13:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy (rev7) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495a983e-f995-e63c-b63b-9a29daa2edbf@suse.de \
--to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox