public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>,
	"lma@semihalf.com" <lma@semihalf.com>
Cc: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com"
	<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"upstream@semihalf.com" <upstream@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/bdb: Fix version check
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:46:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50871c947a53edc1eb7c9e331ae5ce076f789255.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210930134606.227234-1-lma@semihalf.com>

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 15:46 +0200, Lukasz Majczak wrote:
> With patch "drm/i915/vbt: Fix backlight parsing for VBT 234+"
> the size of bdb_lfp_backlight_data structure has been increased,
> causing if-statement in the parse_lfp_backlight function
> that comapres this structure size to the one retrieved from BDB,
> always to fail for older revisions.
> This patch calculates expected size of the structure for a given
> BDB version and compares it with the value gathered from BDB.
> Tested on Chromebook Pixelbook (Nocturne) (reports bdb->version = 221)

Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

> 
> Tested-by: Lukasz Majczak <lma@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majczak <lma@semihalf.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 3c25926092de..f9776ca85de3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -451,13 +451,23 @@ parse_lfp_backlight(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  	}
>  
>  	i915->vbt.backlight.type = INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DISPLAY_DDI;
> -	if (bdb->version >= 191 &&
> -	    get_blocksize(backlight_data) >= sizeof(*backlight_data)) {
> -		const struct lfp_backlight_control_method *method;
> +	if (bdb->version >= 191) {
> +		size_t exp_size;
>  
> -		method = &backlight_data->backlight_control[panel_type];
> -		i915->vbt.backlight.type = method->type;
> -		i915->vbt.backlight.controller = method->controller;
> +		if (bdb->version >= 236)
> +			exp_size = sizeof(struct bdb_lfp_backlight_data);
> +		else if (bdb->version >= 234)
> +			exp_size = EXP_BDB_LFP_BL_DATA_SIZE_REV_234;
> +		else
> +			exp_size = EXP_BDB_LFP_BL_DATA_SIZE_REV_191;
> +
> +		if (get_blocksize(backlight_data) >= exp_size) {
> +			const struct lfp_backlight_control_method *method;
> +
> +			method = &backlight_data->backlight_control[panel_type];
> +			i915->vbt.backlight.type = method->type;
> +			i915->vbt.backlight.controller = method->controller;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	i915->vbt.backlight.pwm_freq_hz = entry->pwm_freq_hz;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> index 330077c2e588..a2108a8f544d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> @@ -814,6 +814,11 @@ struct lfp_brightness_level {
>  	u16 reserved;
>  } __packed;
>  
> +#define EXP_BDB_LFP_BL_DATA_SIZE_REV_191 \
> +	offsetof(struct bdb_lfp_backlight_data, brightness_level)
> +#define EXP_BDB_LFP_BL_DATA_SIZE_REV_234 \
> +	offsetof(struct bdb_lfp_backlight_data, brightness_precision_bits)
> +
>  struct bdb_lfp_backlight_data {
>  	u8 entry_size;
>  	struct lfp_backlight_data_entry data[16];


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-30 13:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/bdb: Fix version check Lukasz Majczak
2021-09-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/bdb: Fix version check (rev3) Patchwork
2021-09-30 17:46 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2021-09-30 20:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-09-30 20:46   ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50871c947a53edc1eb7c9e331ae5ce076f789255.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lma@semihalf.com \
    --cc=shawn.c.lee@intel.com \
    --cc=upstream@semihalf.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox