From: Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org>
To: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, miku@iki.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915: add i915_gem_context_get_reset_status_ioctl
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:02:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5148B658.4000501@freedesktop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ehfblf6h.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com>
On 03/19/2013 05:58 AM, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org> writes:
>
>> On 03/14/2013 08:52 AM, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>>> This ioctl returns context reset status for specified context.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
>>> CC: idr@freedesktop.org
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 1 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
>>> include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
>>> index 7902d97..c919832 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
>>> @@ -1903,6 +1903,7 @@ struct drm_ioctl_desc i915_ioctls[] = {
>>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_GEM_CONTEXT_CREATE, i915_gem_context_create_ioctl, DRM_UNLOCKED),
>>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_GEM_CONTEXT_DESTROY, i915_gem_context_destroy_ioctl, DRM_UNLOCKED),
>>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_REG_READ, i915_reg_read_ioctl, DRM_UNLOCKED),
>>> + DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_GET_RESET_STATUS, i915_gem_context_get_reset_status_ioctl, DRM_UNLOCKED),
>>> };
>>>
>>> int i915_max_ioctl = DRM_ARRAY_SIZE(i915_ioctls);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>>> index 69c9856..a4d06f2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>>> @@ -1267,3 +1267,64 @@ int i915_reg_read_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +int i915_gem_context_get_reset_status_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> + void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>> + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
>>> + struct drm_i915_reset_status *args = data;
>>> + struct ctx_reset_state *rs = NULL;
>>> + unsigned long reset_cnt;
>>> + u32 reset_status = I915_RESET_UNKNOWN;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + ring = &dev_priv->ring[RCS];
>>> +
>>> + ret = i915_gem_context_get_reset_state(ring,
>>> + file,
>>> + args->ctx_id,
>>> + &rs);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + BUG_ON(!rs);
>>> +
>>> + reset_cnt = atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter);
>>> +
>>> + if (reset_cnt & I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS_FLAG ||
>>
>> In this case, I believe we're supposed to return the reset state to the
>> application. The ARB_robustness spec says:
>>
>> "If a reset status other than NO_ERROR is returned and subsequent
>> calls return NO_ERROR, the context reset was encountered and
>> completed. If a reset status is repeatedly returned, the context may
>> be in the process of resetting."
>>
>> If the reset takes a long time, it seems that even a well-behaved app
>> could run afoul of the 'banned' logic.
>
> As there reset status is initialized to I915_RESET_UNKNOWN,
> we return it if the reset is in progress or gpu is wedged.
Hmm... so user space will see I915_RESET_UNKNOWN until the reset is
done, then it will (usually) see either I915_RESET_BATCH_ACTIVE or
I915_RESET_BATCH_PENDING. I think that should be okay.
>>> + reset_cnt == I915_WEDGED) {
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Set guilty/innocent status if only one reset was
>>> + * observed and if only one guilty was found
>>> + */
>>> + if ((rs->reset_cnt + 2) == reset_cnt &&
>>> + (rs->guilty_cnt + 1) == dev_priv->gpu_error.guilty_cnt) {
>>
>> This logic seems... wrong, or at least weird. "rs->reset_cnt + 2" is
>> confusing next to "if only one reset was observed".
>>
>> dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter is the global GPU reset count since
>> start-up, and rs->reset_cnt is the global GPU count since start-up when
>> the context was created. Right?
>
> Right. The confusing part in here is the
> dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter. If it is odd, reset is in progress,
> if it is even, the reset has been handled and all is well. That is why +2
That's a clever hack, I'm assuming, to use atomic operations instead of
locks. Dear God that's awful to understand... it's a tiny bit more
clear looking back at the 'reset_cnt & I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS_FLAG'.
Perhaps we could get some wrapper macros RESET_IN_PROGRESS() and
RESET_ACTUAL_COUNT() or something?
>> If that's the case, this will cause a context that was completely idle
>> (i.e., didn't actually lose anything) to get a reset notification.
>> That's an absolute deal breaker.
>
> This was then misunderstood by me. I will make it so that if you have
> no batches submitted, you wont observe a reset.
>
>> If that's not the case, then this architecture needs a lot more
>> documentation so that people new to it can understand what's happening.
>
> Agreed. If we don't need to care about the contexts where there
> were no batches submitted, the logic will be simpler tho.
>
> -Mika
>
>>> + reset_status = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (rs->guilty)
>>> + reset_status |= I915_RESET_BATCH_ACTIVE;
>>> +
>>> + if (rs->innocent)
>>> + reset_status |= I915_RESET_BATCH_PENDING;
>>> +
>>> + if (reset_status == 0)
>>> + reset_status = I915_RESET_UNKNOWN;
>>> + } else if (rs->reset_cnt == reset_cnt) {
>>> + reset_status = I915_RESET_NO_ERROR;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +out:
>>> + if (!ret)
>>> + args->reset_status = reset_status;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + return ret ? -EINVAL : 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> index 3e11acf..2e5e8e7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> @@ -1712,6 +1712,8 @@ int i915_gem_context_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>>> struct drm_file *file);
>>> int i915_gem_context_destroy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>>> struct drm_file *file);
>>> +int i915_gem_context_get_reset_status_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> + void *data, struct drm_file *file);
>>>
>>> /* i915_gem_gtt.c */
>>> void i915_gem_cleanup_aliasing_ppgtt(struct drm_device *dev);
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>> index 07d5941..a195e0e 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ typedef struct _drm_i915_sarea {
>>> #define DRM_I915_GEM_SET_CACHING 0x2f
>>> #define DRM_I915_GEM_GET_CACHING 0x30
>>> #define DRM_I915_REG_READ 0x31
>>> +#define DRM_I915_GET_RESET_STATUS 0x32
>>>
>>> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_INIT DRM_IOW( DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_INIT, drm_i915_init_t)
>>> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_FLUSH DRM_IO ( DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_FLUSH)
>>> @@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ typedef struct _drm_i915_sarea {
>>> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_CREATE DRM_IOWR (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_CREATE, struct drm_i915_gem_context_create)
>>> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_DESTROY DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_DESTROY, struct drm_i915_gem_context_destroy)
>>> #define DRM_IOCTL_I915_REG_READ DRM_IOWR (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_REG_READ, struct drm_i915_reg_read)
>>> +#define DRM_IOCTL_I915_GET_RESET_STATUS DRM_IOWR (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_GET_RESET_STATUS, struct drm_i915_reset_status)
>>>
>>> /* Allow drivers to submit batchbuffers directly to hardware, relying
>>> * on the security mechanisms provided by hardware.
>>> @@ -980,4 +982,30 @@ struct drm_i915_reg_read {
>>> __u64 offset;
>>> __u64 val; /* Return value */
>>> };
>>> +
>>> +/* No reset observed */
>>> +#define I915_RESET_NO_ERROR 0
>>> +
>>> +/* Context had batch processing active while
>>> + gpu hung and batch was guilty of gpu hang */
>>> +#define I915_RESET_BATCH_ACTIVE (1 << 0)
>>> +
>>> +/* Context had batch queued for processing while
>>> + reset occurred and guilty batch was found:
>>> + I915_RESET_BATCH_ACTIVE was set for this or
>>> + some other context */
>>> +#define I915_RESET_BATCH_PENDING (1 << 1)
>>> +
>>> +/* Context observed gpu hung and reset but guilty context
>>> + was not found: I915_RESET_BATCH_ACTIVE and
>>> + I915_RESET_BATCH_PENDING were not set for any context */
>>> +#define I915_RESET_UNKNOWN (1 << 2)
>>> +
>>> +struct drm_i915_reset_status {
>>> + __u32 ctx_id;
>>> + __u32 flags;
>>> + __u32 reset_status;
>>> + __u32 pad;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> #endif /* _UAPI_I915_DRM_H_ */
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 15:52 [PATCH v2 00/16] arb robustness enablers v2 Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/i915: return context from i915_switch_context() Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/i915: cleanup i915_add_request Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-15 9:43 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/i915: reference count for i915_hw_contexts Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-15 9:44 ` Chris Wilson
2013-04-02 22:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] [v3] " Ben Widawsky
2013-04-03 1:27 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-04-03 11:56 ` Chris Wilson
2013-04-03 16:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Print all contexts in debugfs Ben Widawsky
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/i915: Resurrect ring kicking for semaphores, selectively Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-17 21:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/i915: pass seqno to i915_hangcheck_ring_idle Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/i915: track ring progression using seqnos Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-15 9:48 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915: introduce i915_hangcheck_ring_hung Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/i915: detect hang using per ring hangcheck_score Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: remove i915_hangcheck_hung Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915: add struct ctx_reset_state Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-15 9:52 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-17 21:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-18 20:18 ` Ian Romanick
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/i915: add reset_state for hw_contexts Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-15 9:53 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/i915: add batch object and context to i915_add_request() Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/i915: mark rings which were waiting when hang happened Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/i915: find guilty batch buffer on ring resets Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/i915: refuse to submit more batchbuffers from guilty context Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915: add i915_gem_context_get_reset_status_ioctl Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-15 10:01 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-18 20:26 ` Ian Romanick
2013-03-19 12:58 ` Mika Kuoppala
2013-03-19 19:02 ` Ian Romanick [this message]
2013-03-19 19:21 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5148B658.4000501@freedesktop.org \
--to=idr@freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=miku@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox