From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:13:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53aa14b3-87b5-65e9-42e3-198dc55c0a51@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b741db2d0b50b634a995d6f7bbfbf70b35818850.camel@linux.intel.com>
On 08/06/2021 08:39, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 19:22 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> Move back to the buddy allocator for managing device local memory,
>> and
>> restore the lost mock selftests. Keep around the range manager
>> related
>> bits, since we likely need this for managing stolen at some point.
>> For
>> stolen we also don't need to reserve anything so no need to support a
>> generic reserve interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 26 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 55 +-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h | 17 --
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 100 +++--------
>> .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 170 ++++++++++++----
>> --
>>
>
> ...
>
>>
>> static int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
>> @@ -661,20 +661,8 @@ int __i915_gem_ttm_object_init(struct
>> intel_memory_region *mem,
>> static struct lock_class_key lock_class;
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = mem->i915;
>> enum ttm_bo_type bo_type;
>> - size_t alignment = 0;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - /* Adjust alignment to GPU- and CPU huge page sizes. */
>> -
>> - if (mem->is_range_manager) {
>> - if (size >= SZ_1G)
>> - alignment = SZ_1G >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - else if (size >= SZ_2M)
>> - alignment = SZ_2M >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - else if (size >= SZ_64K)
>> - alignment = SZ_64K >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - }
>> -
>> drm_gem_private_object_init(&i915->drm, &obj->base, size);
>> i915_gem_object_init(obj, &i915_gem_ttm_obj_ops, &lock_class,
>> flags);
>> i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(obj, mem);
>> @@ -696,7 +684,7 @@ int __i915_gem_ttm_object_init(struct
>> intel_memory_region *mem,
>> */
>> obj->base.vma_node.driver_private = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
>> ret = ttm_bo_init(&i915->bdev, i915_gem_to_ttm(obj), size,
>> - bo_type, &i915_sys_placement, alignment,
>> + bo_type, &i915_sys_placement, PAGE_SIZE,
>
> Actually just realized that the alignment is specified in PAGE_SIZE
> units, so above should be s/PAGE_SIZE/1/. Might need to check that the
> buddy TTM interface gets this right as well.
Oops, and yes it looks like the buddy is also confused here.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-07 18:22 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Add back the buddy allocator Matthew Auld
2021-06-07 18:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 7:11 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 8:11 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:15 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-07 18:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/ttm: add i915_sg_from_buddy_resource Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 7:19 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-07 18:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time Matthew Auld
2021-06-07 18:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 7:26 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 8:08 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-07 18:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 7:34 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 7:39 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 8:13 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2021-06-07 18:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/ttm: restore min_page_size behaviour Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 7:41 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-07 20:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Add back the buddy allocator Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53aa14b3-87b5-65e9-42e3-198dc55c0a51@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox