From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: use kref_put_mutex in i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:51:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5523E0F0.10403@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150407133702.GG6354@phenom.ffwll.local>
Op 07-04-15 om 15:37 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:32:02AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index b13c5526a73b..7aaf8eddf19c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -2146,14 +2146,14 @@ i915_gem_request_unreference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>> static inline void
>> i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>> {
>> - if (req && !atomic_add_unless(&req->ref.refcount, -1, 1)) {
>> - struct drm_device *dev = req->ring->dev;
>> + struct drm_device *dev;
>> +
>> + if (!req)
>> + return;
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>> - if (likely(atomic_dec_and_test(&req->ref.refcount)))
>> - i915_gem_request_free(&req->ref);
>> + dev = req->ring->dev;
>> + if (kref_put_mutex(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free, &dev->struct_mutex))
>> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> We don't need this conditional unlock here since that's only possible if
> you have a weak reference somewhere (i.e. using kref_get_unless_zero). If
> the object only has strong references and you're dropping the last one it
> can't magically get resurrected somehow.
Because we use the same put call for kref_put and kref_put_mutex we do need to unlock struct_mutex here,
kref_put_mutex doesn't release the mutex if true, so either the release call needs to do it or the callee.
> And drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked wants the same patch I think.
Indeed it does, but with slightly more lockdep annotation!
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-07 9:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: use kref_put_mutex in i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked Maarten Lankhorst
2015-04-07 13:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-04-07 13:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2015-04-07 14:04 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5523E0F0.10403@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox