From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_16013835468
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:31:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58719859135cac269040f5f1663127d239e6fe7d.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210185223.95399-2-jose.souza@intel.com>
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 10:52 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> PSR2 workaround required when mode has delayed vblank.
>
> BSpec: 52890
> BSpec: 49421
> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 40
> ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 13 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 72bd8d3261e0c..2e0b092f4b6be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1063,7 +1063,23 @@ static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> intel_dp->psr.active = true;
> }
>
> -static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static u32 wa_16013835468_bit_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + switch (intel_dp->psr.pipe) {
> + case PIPE_A:
> + return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_A;
> + case PIPE_B:
> + return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_B;
> + case PIPE_C:
> + return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_C;
> + default:
> + MISSING_CASE(intel_dp->psr.pipe);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> @@ -1133,6 +1149,20 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
> if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CLKGATE_DIS_MISC, 0,
> CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS)
> ;
> +
> + /* Wa_16013835468:tgl[b0+], dg1 */
> + if (IS_TGL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_B0,
> STEP_FOREVER) ||
> + IS_DG1(dev_priv)) {
> + u16 vtotal, vblank;
> +
> + vtotal = crtc_state-
> >uapi.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal -
> + crtc_state-
> >uapi.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
> + vblank = crtc_state-
> >uapi.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_end -
> + crtc_state-
> >uapi.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start;
> + if (vblank > vtotal)
Can you please explain how this calculation indicates we are using
"delayed vblank"?
Otherwise patch seems to be doing what is written in WA description.
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv,
> GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, 0,
> + wa_16013835468_bit_get(int
> el_dp));
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1198,7 +1228,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_locked(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> intel_write_dp_vsc_sdp(encoder, crtc_state, &crtc_state-
> >psr_vsc);
> intel_snps_phy_update_psr_power_state(dev_priv, phy, true);
> intel_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
> - intel_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
> + intel_psr_enable_source(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> intel_dp->psr.enabled = true;
> intel_dp->psr.paused = false;
>
> @@ -1297,6 +1327,12 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
> if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CLKGATE_DIS_MISC,
> CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS,
> 0);
> +
> + /* Wa_16013835468:tgl[b0+], dg1 */
> + if (IS_TGL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_B0,
> STEP_FOREVER) ||
> + IS_DG1(dev_priv))
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> + wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp),
> 0);
> }
>
> intel_snps_phy_update_psr_power_state(dev_priv, phy, false);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 87c92314ee269..1cd4056400b63 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -6040,11 +6040,14 @@
> #define HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT _MMIO(0x46408)
> #define RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE (1 << 4)
>
> -#define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430)
> -#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT REG_BIT(30)
> -#define ICL_DELAY_PMRSP REG_BIT(22)
> -#define DISABLE_FLR_SRC REG_BIT(15)
> -#define MASK_WAKEMEM REG_BIT(13)
> +#define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430)
> +#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT REG_BIT(30)
> +#define LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_C REG_BIT(25)
> +#define LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_B REG_BIT(24)
> +#define LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_A REG_BIT(23)
> +#define ICL_DELAY_PMRSP REG_BIT(22)
> +#define DISABLE_FLR_SRC REG_BIT(15)
> +#define MASK_WAKEMEM REG_BIT(13)
>
> #define GEN11_CHICKEN_DCPR_2 _MMIO(0x46434)
> #define DCPR_MASK_MAXLATENCY_MEMUP_CLR REG_BIT(27)
BR,
Jouni Högander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 18:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: Group PSR2 prog sequences and workarounds José Roberto de Souza
2022-02-10 18:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_16013835468 José Roberto de Souza
2022-02-15 12:31 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2022-02-16 13:48 ` Souza, Jose
2022-02-18 13:12 ` Hogander, Jouni
2022-02-15 13:47 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-16 13:45 ` Souza, Jose
2022-02-10 19:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Group PSR2 prog sequences and workarounds Patchwork
2022-02-10 20:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 0:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-02-18 15:07 ` Souza, Jose
2022-02-18 13:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Hogander, Jouni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58719859135cac269040f5f1663127d239e6fe7d.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox