From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
cohuck@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 19:16:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e17a35d-2a94-f482-c466-521afcab80b8@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7dehnZSC6ukNxKU@nvidia.com>
On 1/5/23 6:34 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 03:09:30PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:33:11 -0400
>> Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Rather than relying on a notifier for associating the KVM with
>>> the group, let's assume that the association has already been
>>> made prior to device_open. The first time a device is opened
>>> associate the group KVM with the device.
>>>
>>> This fixes a user-triggerable oops in GVT.
>>
>> It seems this has traded an oops for a deadlock, which still exists
>> today in both GVT-g and vfio-ap. These are the only vfio drivers that
>> care about kvm, so they make use of kvm_{get,put}_kvm(), where the
vfio-pci-zdev also
>> latter is called by their .close_device() callbacks.
Huh, I've never seen this deadlock with vfio-pci-zdev or vfio-ap, but I see what you're saying... I guess it's not seen under typical circumstances with QEMU because kvm_vfio_group_del would have already been triggered via KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL by the time we close the device, such that the group would not be found during the kvm_vfio_destroy call? (I'm not at all suggesting that we should rely on userspace behaving in this order, just wondering why I never saw it while testing)
>
> Bleck
>
> It is pretty common to run the final part of 'put' from a workqueue
> specifically to avoid stuff like this, eg fput does it
>
> Maybe that is the simplest?
Yeah, this is also what I was thinking, replace the direct kvm_put_kvm calls with, say, schedule_delayed_work in each driver, where the delayed task just does the kvm_put_kvm (along with a brief comment explaining why we handle the put asynchronously).
Other than that.. The goal of this patch originally was to get the kvm reference at first open_device and release it with the very last close_device, so the only other option I could think of would be to take the responsibility back from the vfio drivers and do the kvm_get_kvm and kvm_put_kvm directly in vfio_main after dropping the (but that would result in some ugly symbol linkage and would acquire kvm references that a driver maybe does not care about so I don't really like that idea)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220519183311.582380-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20220519183311.582380-2-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
2022-05-20 5:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-23 16:41 ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-24 11:39 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-01-05 22:09 ` Alex Williamson
2023-01-05 23:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-06 0:16 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2023-01-06 0:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-06 1:03 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-06 14:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/1] " Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e17a35d-2a94-f482-c466-521afcab80b8@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox