From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display/lspcon: Increase LSPCON mode settle timeout
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 10:05:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b49563d-e9e7-ae8e-582e-f4aead06de0a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230614235452.3765265-1-pceballos@google.com>
On 6/15/2023 5:24 AM, Pablo Ceballos wrote:
> This is to eliminate all cases of "*ERROR* LSPCON mode hasn't settled",
> followed by link training errors. Intel engineers recommended increasing
> this timeout and that does resolve the issue.
>
> On some CometLake-based device designs the Parade PS175 takes more than
> 400ms to settle in PCON mode. 100 reboot trials on one device resulted
> in a median settle time of 440ms and a maximum of 444ms. Even after
> increasing the timeout to 500ms, 2% of devices still had this error. So
> this increases the timeout to 800ms.
In one of the gitlab issue, it was tried with 1000ms as well, situation
did improve, but issue didn't get fully resolved. [1].
I was wondering if trying to set LS/PCON mode multiple time will have
any effect.
Unfortunately I do not have access to machine with Parade LSPCON chip,
had suggested in yet another git lab issue [2].
I have a patch for this, sent to try-bot, though not sent to intel-gfx
yet [3].
The timeout value was already increased from 100 ms to 400 ms earlier too.
If there is indeed no other way, perhaps need to have this solution.
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4516#note_1406500
[2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4458#note_1922654
[3] Patch :
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/538819/?series=118208&rev=1
Regards,
Ankit
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog since v1:
> - Added more details in the commit message
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> index bb3b5355a0d9..d7299fdc43ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static enum drm_lspcon_mode lspcon_wait_mode(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon,
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Waiting for LSPCON mode %s to settle\n",
> lspcon_mode_name(mode));
>
> - wait_for((current_mode = lspcon_get_current_mode(lspcon)) == mode, 400);
> + wait_for((current_mode = lspcon_get_current_mode(lspcon)) == mode, 800);
> if (current_mode != mode)
> drm_err(&i915->drm, "LSPCON mode hasn't settled\n");
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-15 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-14 23:54 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display/lspcon: Increase LSPCON mode settle timeout Pablo Ceballos
2023-06-15 4:35 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2023-07-07 19:34 ` Pablo Ceballos
2023-07-10 4:02 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-06-15 7:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/lspcon: Increase LSPCON mode settle timeout (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b49563d-e9e7-ae8e-582e-f4aead06de0a@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pceballos@google.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox