Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Allow users to disable PSR2

["Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>]

On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 12:12 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:41:03AM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > Some users are suffering with PSR2 issues that are under debug or
> > issues that were root caused to panel firmware, to make life of those
> > users easier here adding a option to disable PSR1 with kernel
> > parameter.
> > 
> > Using the same enable_psr that is current used to turn PSR1 and PSR2
> > off or on and adding a new value to only disable PSR2.
> > The previous valid values did not had their behavior changed.
> > 
> > Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4951
> > Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 4 ++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c       | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 2e0b092f4b6be..fc6b684bb7bec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -100,11 +100,15 @@ static bool psr_global_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  
> >  static bool psr2_global_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > +
> >  	switch (intel_dp->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) {
> >  	case I915_PSR_DEBUG_DISABLE:
> >  	case I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1:
> >  		return false;
> >  	default:
> > +		if (i915->params.enable_psr == 2)
> > +			return false;
> >  		return true;
> >  	}
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > index eea355c2fc28a..a9b97e6eb3df0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ i915_param_named_unsafe(enable_hangcheck, bool, 0400,
> >  
> >  i915_param_named_unsafe(enable_psr, int, 0400,
> >  	"Enable PSR "
> > -	"(0=disabled, 1=enabled) "
> > +	"(0=disabled, 1=enable up to PSR2 if supported, 2=enable up to PSR1) "
> 
> That seems very unintuitive. I would just make it 1==PSR1 and 2==PSR2.

This will break current behavior.

Other option is to add another parameter...

> 
> >  	"Default: -1 (use per-chip default)");
> >  
> >  i915_param_named(psr_safest_params, bool, 0400,
> > -- 
> > 2.35.1
>