From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Cc: "jhubbard@nvidia.com" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Intel Graphics Development <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
"aritger@nvidia.com" <aritger@nvidia.com>,
"Nieto, David M" <David.Nieto@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Per client engine busyness
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:40:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71428a10-4b2f-dbbf-7678-7487f9eda6a5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPj87rOL7SEVXoH1rWH9ypj7idRmVPLXzmEsdVqFdVjsMh5PbA@mail.gmail.com>
On 18/05/2021 10:16, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 10:09, Tvrtko Ursulin
> <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> I was just wondering if stat(2) and a chrdev major check would be a
>> solid criteria to more efficiently (compared to parsing the text
>> content) detect drm files while walking procfs.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but is the per-PID walk actually a
> measurable performance issue rather than just a bit unpleasant?
Per pid and per each open fd.
As said in the other thread what bothers me a bit in this scheme is that
the cost of obtaining GPU usage scales based on non-GPU criteria.
For use case of a top-like tool which shows all processes this is a
smaller additional cost, but then for a gpu-top like tool it is somewhat
higher.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-13 10:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Per client engine busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Expose list of clients in sysfs Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Update client name on context create Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Make GEM contexts track DRM clients Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Track runtime spent in closed and unreachable GEM contexts Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Track all user contexts per client Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Track context current active time Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Per client engine busyness Patchwork
2021-05-13 11:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-05-13 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-05-13 15:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] " Alex Deucher
2021-05-13 16:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 5:58 ` Alex Deucher
2021-05-14 7:22 ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-14 8:04 ` Christian König
2021-05-14 13:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 13:53 ` Christian König
2021-05-14 14:47 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 14:56 ` Christian König
2021-05-14 15:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 15:10 ` Christian König
2021-05-17 14:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-17 14:39 ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 16:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-17 18:02 ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 18:16 ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 19:03 ` Simon Ser
2021-05-18 9:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18 9:16 ` Daniel Stone
2021-05-18 9:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-05-19 16:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-19 18:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-19 23:17 ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-20 14:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-20 14:12 ` Christian König
2021-05-20 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [Nouveau] " arabek
2021-05-20 8:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-24 10:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18 9:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18 12:06 ` Christian König
2021-05-17 19:16 ` Christian König
2021-06-28 10:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-28 14:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-15 10:40 ` Maxime Schmitt
2021-05-17 16:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-17 14:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-13 16:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71428a10-4b2f-dbbf-7678-7487f9eda6a5@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
--cc=David.Nieto@amd.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=aritger@nvidia.com \
--cc=contact@emersion.fr \
--cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox