public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [BrownBag] drm/i915/gtt: Neuter the deferred unbind callback from gen6_ppgtt_cleanup
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 09:23:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <784ff780-a9b2-b997-1e4f-ed47f313d280@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155868585422.28319.13611154637326086125@skylake-alporthouse-com>


On 24/05/2019 09:17, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-24 09:13:14)
>>
>> On 24/05/2019 07:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Having deferred the vma destruction to a worker where we can acquire the
>>> struct_mutex, we have to avoid chasing back into the now destroyed
>>> ppgtt. The pd_vma is special in having a custom unbind function to scan
>>> for unused pages despite the VMA itself being notionally part of the
>>> GGTT. As such, we need to disable that callback to avoid a
>>> use-after-free.
>>>
>>> This unfortunately blew up so early during boot that CI declared the
>>> machine unreachable as opposed to being the major failure it was. Oops.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d3622099c76f ("drm/i915/gtt: Always acquire struct_mutex for gen6_ppgtt_cleanup")
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>>> index 8d8a4b0ad4d9..266baa11df64 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>>> @@ -1847,6 +1847,33 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *wrk)
>>>        kfree(work);
>>>    }
>>>    
>>> +static int nop_set_pages(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>> +{
>>> +     return -ENODEV;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void nop_clear_pages(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int nop_bind(struct i915_vma *vma,
>>> +                 enum i915_cache_level cache_level,
>>> +                 u32 unused)
>>> +{
>>> +     return -ENODEV;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void nop_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct i915_vma_ops nop_vma_ops = {
>>> +     .set_pages = nop_set_pages,
>>> +     .clear_pages = nop_clear_pages,
>>> +     .bind_vma = nop_bind,
>>> +     .unbind_vma = nop_unbind,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>    static void gen6_ppgtt_cleanup(struct i915_address_space *vm)
>>>    {
>>>        struct gen6_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt = to_gen6_ppgtt(i915_vm_to_ppgtt(vm));
>>> @@ -1855,6 +1882,7 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_cleanup(struct i915_address_space *vm)
>>>        /* FIXME remove the struct_mutex to bring the locking under control */
>>>        INIT_WORK(&work->base, gen6_ppgtt_cleanup_work);
>>>        work->vma = ppgtt->vma;
>>> +     work->vma->ops = &nop_vma_ops;
>>
>> Could we use some asserts before overriding the vma ops? Like
>> GEM_BUG_ON(vma->pages)? And something for still bound?
> 
> It technically still is bound as it is in the GGTT but currently
> unpinned -- that will be checked on destroy, it's just we also get an
> unbind callback. vma->pages doesn't exist for this (set to ERR_PTR).

If we are getting the unbind callback and we nop-ed it, who will 
actually do it's job?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-24  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-24  6:45 [BrownBag] drm/i915/gtt: Neuter the deferred unbind callback from gen6_ppgtt_cleanup Chris Wilson
2019-05-24  8:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-24  8:17   ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-24  8:23     ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-05-24  8:29       ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-24  8:31         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-24  8:36           ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-24  8:51             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-24  8:55               ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-24  8:57               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-24  9:01                 ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-24  9:08                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-24  8:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=784ff780-a9b2-b997-1e4f-ed47f313d280@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox