public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/22] drm/i915/dg1: Wait for pcode/uncore handshake at startup
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 23:24:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <791224e3effd491cc3276cbe55a2958dafdfe3fd.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724213918.27424-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 14:39 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: Matt Roper <
> matthew.d.roper@intel.com
> >
> 
> DG1 does some additional pcode/uncore handshaking at
> boot time; this handshaking must complete before various other pcode
> commands are effective and before general work is submitted to the GPU.
> We need to poll a new pcode mailbox during startup until it reports that
> this handshaking is complete.
> 
> The bspec doesn't give guidance on how long we may need to wait for this
> handshaking to complete.  For now, let's just set a really long timeout;
> if we still don't get a completion status by the end of that timeout,
> we'll just continue on and hope for the best.
> 
> Bspec: 52065
> Cc: Clinton Taylor <
> Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com
> >
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <
> ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
> >
> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <
> radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
> >
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <
> matthew.d.roper@intel.com
> >
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <
> lucas.demarchi@intel.com
> >
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c       |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h       |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 5fd5af4bc855..5473bfe9126c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
>  #include "intel_gvt.h"
>  #include "intel_memory_region.h"
>  #include "intel_pm.h"
> +#include "intel_sideband.h"
>  #include "vlv_suspend.h"
>  
>  static struct drm_driver driver;
> @@ -737,6 +738,8 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	 */
>  	intel_dram_detect(dev_priv);
>  
> +	intel_pcode_init(dev_priv);
> +
>  	intel_bw_init_hw(dev_priv);
>  
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index a0d31f3bf634..3767b32127da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -9245,6 +9245,9 @@ enum {
>  #define     GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE			0x0
>  #define     GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED		0x1
>  #define     GEN9_SAGV_ENABLE			0x3
> +#define   DG1_PCODE_STATUS			0x7E
> +#define     DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS	0x0
> +#define     DG1_UNCORE_INIT_COMPLETE		0x1

With s/DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS/DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS_COMPLETE or something similar that makes easy to understand that 0x1 is the response
of the DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS sub-command.

Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>


>  #define GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US	0x23
>  #define GEN6_PCODE_DATA				_MMIO(0x138128)
>  #define   GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_IA_RATIO_SHIFT	8
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> index 916ccd1c0e96..8b093525240d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> @@ -543,3 +543,18 @@ int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 request,
>  	return ret ? ret : status;
>  #undef COND
>  }
> +
> +void intel_pcode_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!IS_DGFX(i915))
> +		return;
> +
> +	ret = skl_pcode_request(i915, DG1_PCODE_STATUS,
> +				DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS,
> +				DG1_UNCORE_INIT_COMPLETE,
> +				DG1_UNCORE_INIT_COMPLETE, 50);
> +	if (ret)
> +		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Pcode did not report uncore initialization completion!\n");
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
> index 7fb95745a444..094c7b19c5d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
> @@ -138,4 +138,6 @@ int sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox,
>  int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 request,
>  		      u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms);
>  
> +void intel_pcode_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +
>  #endif /* _INTEL_SIDEBAND_H */
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-03 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-24 21:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 00/22] Introduce DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 01/22] drm/i915/dg1: Initialize RAWCLK properly Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 16:35   ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-24 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 02/22] drm/i915/dg1: Define MOCS table for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 19:38   ` Matt Roper
2020-07-24 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 03/22] drm/i915/dg1: Add DG1 power wells Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 20:51   ` Matt Roper
2020-08-13  7:59     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 04/22] drm/i915/dg1: Increase mmio size to 4MB Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 21:48   ` Matt Roper
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/22] drm/i915/dg1: Wait for pcode/uncore handshake at startup Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:24   ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2020-08-24 19:24     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-24 19:29       ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 06/22] drm/i915/dg1: Add DPLL macros for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 21:54   ` Matt Roper
2020-08-13  8:07     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 07/22] drm/i915/dg1: Add and setup DPLLs " Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 22:14   ` Matt Roper
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 08/22] drm/i915/dg1: Enable DPLL " Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 09/22] drm/i915/dg1: add hpd interrupt handling Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 10/22] drm/i915/dg1: invert HPD pins Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 11/22] drm/i915/dg1: gmbus pin mapping Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 12/22] drm/i915/dg1: Enable first 2 ports for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 13/22] drm/i915/dg1: Don't program PHY_MISC for PHY-C and PHY-D Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 14/22] drm/i915/dg1: Update comp master/slave relationships for PHYs Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 15/22] drm/i915/dg1: Update voltage swing tables for DP Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:48   ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 16/22] drm/i915/dg1: provide port/phy mapping for vbt Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 17/22] drm/i915/dg1: map/unmap pll clocks Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 18/22] drm/i915/dg1: enable PORT C/D aka D/E Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 19/22] drm/i915/dg1: Load DMC Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:27   ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 20/22] drm/i915/dg1: Add initial DG1 workarounds Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 21/22] drm/i915/dg1: DG1 does not support DC6 Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:33   ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-24 21:26     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 22/22] drm/i915/dg1: Change DMC_DEBUG{1, 2} registers Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:31   ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-07 13:14     ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-07 17:26       ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-10  5:48         ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-13  7:56           ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce DG1 Patchwork
2020-07-24 21:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-24 22:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=791224e3effd491cc3276cbe55a2958dafdfe3fd.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox