From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915: Update the helper to set correct mapping
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:01:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b108dc9-b03c-2f9c-0d44-cb672daec9ae@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b1b88db-da62-841d-23cd-7902c9a78b77@intel.com>
On 19/04/2021 15:37, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 19/04/2021 15:07, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 19/04/2021 12:30, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>> On 15/04/2021 12:05, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 15/04/2021 10:23, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 09:21, Tvrtko Ursulin
>>>>> <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14/04/2021 17:20, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 16:22, Tvrtko Ursulin
>>>>>>> <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2021 10:05, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>>>>>>>> From: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota
>>>>>>>>> <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Determine the possible coherent map type based on object location,
>>>>>>>>> and if target has llc or if user requires an always coherent
>>>>>>>>> mapping.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>> Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota
>>>>>>>>> <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 ++-
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c | 3 ++-
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 11 +++++++++--
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>>>>> 11 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>>>>>>>> index efe935f80c1a..b79568d370f5 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -664,7 +664,8 @@ static int init_status_page(struct
>>>>>>>>> intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>>>>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>>>>>> goto err;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, I915_MAP_WB);
>>>>>>>>> + vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj,
>>>>>>>>> + i915_coherent_map_type(engine->i915, obj, true));
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
>>>>>>>>> ret = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
>>>>>>>>> goto err_unpin;
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
>>>>>>>>> index 7c9af86fdb1e..47f4397095e5 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static void dbg_poison_ce(struct
>>>>>>>>> intel_context *ce)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> if (ce->state) {
>>>>>>>>> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = ce->state->obj;
>>>>>>>>> - int type = i915_coherent_map_type(ce->engine->i915);
>>>>>>>>> + int type =
>>>>>>>>> i915_coherent_map_type(ce->engine->i915, obj, true);
>>>>>>>>> void *map;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> if (!i915_gem_object_trylock(obj))
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>>>>>>>>> index e86897cde984..aafe2a4df496 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -903,7 +903,9 @@ lrc_pre_pin(struct intel_context *ce,
>>>>>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_pinned(ce->state));
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(ce->state->obj,
>>>>>>>>> - i915_coherent_map_type(ce->engine->i915) |
>>>>>>>>> + i915_coherent_map_type(ce->engine->i915,
>>>>>>>>> + ce->state->obj,
>>>>>>>>> + false) |
>>>>>>>>> I915_MAP_OVERRIDE);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(*vaddr);
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
>>>>>>>>> index aee0a77c77e0..3cf6c7e68108 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -53,9 +53,12 @@ int intel_ring_pin(struct intel_ring *ring,
>>>>>>>>> struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma))
>>>>>>>>> addr = (void __force *)i915_vma_pin_iomap(vma);
>>>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>>>> - addr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(vma->obj,
>>>>>>>>> - i915_coherent_map_type(vma->vm->i915));
>>>>>>>>> + else {
>>>>>>>>> + int type = i915_coherent_map_type(vma->vm->i915,
>>>>>>>>> vma->obj, false);
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + addr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(vma->obj, type);
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(addr)) {
>>>>>>>>> ret = PTR_ERR(addr);
>>>>>>>>> goto err_ring;
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c
>>>>>>>>> index b9bdd1d23243..26685b927169 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ static int __live_context_size(struct
>>>>>>>>> intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>>>>>>>> goto err;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(ce->state->obj,
>>>>>>>>> - i915_coherent_map_type(engine->i915));
>>>>>>>>> + i915_coherent_map_type(engine->i915,
>>>>>>>>> + ce->state->obj, false));
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
>>>>>>>>> err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
>>>>>>>>> intel_context_unpin(ce);
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
>>>>>>>>> index 746985971c3a..5b63d4df8c93 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int hang_init(struct hang *h, struct
>>>>>>>>> intel_gt *gt)
>>>>>>>>> h->seqno = memset(vaddr, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(h->obj,
>>>>>>>>> - i915_coherent_map_type(gt->i915));
>>>>>>>>> + i915_coherent_map_type(gt->i915, h->obj, false));
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
>>>>>>>>> err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
>>>>>>>>> goto err_unpin_hws;
>>>>>>>>> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ hang_create_request(struct hang *h, struct
>>>>>>>>> intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>>>>>>>> return ERR_CAST(obj);
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(obj,
>>>>>>>>> i915_coherent_map_type(gt->i915));
>>>>>>>>> + vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(obj,
>>>>>>>>> i915_coherent_map_type(gt->i915, obj, false));
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
>>>>>>>>> i915_gem_object_put(obj);
>>>>>>>>> i915_vm_put(vm);
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
>>>>>>>>> index 85e7df6a5123..d8f6623524e8 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -1221,7 +1221,9 @@ static int compare_isolation(struct
>>>>>>>>> intel_engine_cs *engine,
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lrc = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(ce->state->obj,
>>>>>>>>> - i915_coherent_map_type(engine->i915));
>>>>>>>>> + i915_coherent_map_type(engine->i915,
>>>>>>>>> + ce->state->obj,
>>>>>>>>> + false));
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(lrc)) {
>>>>>>>>> err = PTR_ERR(lrc);
>>>>>>>>> goto err_B1;
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
>>>>>>>>> index 78305b2ec89d..adae04c47aab 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -682,7 +682,9 @@ int intel_guc_allocate_and_map_vma(struct
>>>>>>>>> intel_guc *guc, u32 size,
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(vma))
>>>>>>>>> return PTR_ERR(vma);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(vma->obj,
>>>>>>>>> I915_MAP_WB);
>>>>>>>>> + vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(vma->obj,
>>>>>>>>> + i915_coherent_map_type(guc_to_gt(guc)->i915,
>>>>>>>>> + vma->obj, true));
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
>>>>>>>>> i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&vma, 0);
>>>>>>>>> return PTR_ERR(vaddr);
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
>>>>>>>>> index 2126dd81ac38..56d2144dc6a0 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ static int intel_huc_rsa_data_create(struct
>>>>>>>>> intel_huc *huc)
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(vma))
>>>>>>>>> return PTR_ERR(vma);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(vma->obj,
>>>>>>>>> I915_MAP_WB);
>>>>>>>>> + vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(vma->obj,
>>>>>>>>> + i915_coherent_map_type(gt->i915,
>>>>>>>>> + vma->obj, true));
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
>>>>>>>>> i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&vma, 0);
>>>>>>>>> return PTR_ERR(vaddr);
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>>>>>>> index 69e43bf91a15..2abbc06712a4 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
>>>>>>>>> #include "gem/i915_gem_context_types.h"
>>>>>>>>> #include "gem/i915_gem_shrinker.h"
>>>>>>>>> #include "gem/i915_gem_stolen.h"
>>>>>>>>> +#include "gem/i915_gem_lmem.h"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #include "gt/intel_engine.h"
>>>>>>>>> #include "gt/intel_gt_types.h"
>>>>>>>>> @@ -1921,9 +1922,15 @@ static inline int
>>>>>>>>> intel_hws_csb_write_index(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> static inline enum i915_map_type
>>>>>>>>> -i915_coherent_map_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>>>>>>> +i915_coherent_map_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>>>>>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool
>>>>>>>>> always_coherent)
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> - return HAS_LLC(i915) ? I915_MAP_WB : I915_MAP_WC;
>>>>>>>>> + if (i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj))
>>>>>>>>> + return I915_MAP_WC;
>>>>>>>>> + if (HAS_LLC(i915) || always_coherent)
>>>>>>>>> + return I915_MAP_WB;
>>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>>> + return I915_MAP_WC;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Seems this patch is doing two things.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> First it is adding lmem support to this helper by always
>>>>>>>> returning WC
>>>>>>>> for lmem objects.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Secondly it is introducing an idea of "always coherent" in a helper
>>>>>>>> called i915_coherent_map_type. Could someone explain what is
>>>>>>>> coherent vs
>>>>>>>> always coherent?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And also, why is always coherent happy with WB? Sounds counter
>>>>>>>> intuitive
>>>>>>>> to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All this does is try to keep the existing behaviour intact, whilst
>>>>>>> also ensuring that all lmem objects are mapped using only WC, no
>>>>>>> matter what. The always_coherent=true thing is for the existing
>>>>>>> places
>>>>>>> where we sometimes map the object using WB, without first
>>>>>>> considering
>>>>>>> whether the device has the fast shared LLC vs snooping. Yes, it's
>>>>>>> slightly ugly :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not fully following - if we had to write kerneldoc for
>>>>>> always_coherent
>>>>>> input argument - what it would say?
>>>>>
>>>>> @always_coherent - If true we should always try to map the object
>>>>> using WB. If false we should only map as WB if the device supports the
>>>>> fast shared LLC, in the case of snooped devices we will map use WC.
>>>>> Note that If the resource is lmem then we will always map as WC,
>>>>> regardless of the value of always_coherent, since that's all we
>>>>> currently support.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the naming is poor?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe just confusing to me, not sure yet.
>>>>
>>>> So always_coherent is not about how the callers wants to use it, but
>>>> about platform knowledge? Or a performance concern for LLC vs
>>>> snooping cases? Does WB works (coherently) on snooping platforms?
>>>
>>> The always_coherent=true is for the existing callers that want WB,
>>> regardless of LLC vs snooping.
>>>
>>> The other callers use the existing i915_coherent_map_type() which
>>> only gives out WB for LLC platforms.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, LLC vs snooping should offer the same in terms of coherency,
>>> but in terms of performance the shared LLC is much faster, and so for
>>> snooping platforms we choose to not enable WB everywhere.
>>>
>>> On top of that we now have lmem, but for that we only allow WC. This
>>> patch just rolls all of that into one helper, while keeping the
>>> existing behaviour unchanged.
>>
>> Thanks. But I am still struggling with the API. :(
>>
>> Is the introduction of always_coherent flag in the context of DG1
>> required even? AFAICT for lmem objects the flag is ignored so no?
>
> If we drop the flag/helper thing, then we need something like:
>
> type = WB;
> if (i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj))
> type = WC;
>
> vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, type);
>
> In all the places where we currently do:
>
> vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, WB);
>
> Where obj can be lmem, so ctx, ring, guc etc. Is that better or worse?
> The existing i915_coherent_map_type() callers should work as-is, since
> DG1 is snooped. And this patch just extends that to cover all cases.
>
> Perhaps we need a new helper instead? Maybe you have a better idea?
Not yet. Would it make sense to put something in kerneldoc about when
callers might choose always_coherent true vs false? In terms of expected
usage (frequency, simplicity?) and any rules with regards when callers
need to worry about flushing/ordering when there are mixed read and writes?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-19 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 9:05 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/19] More DG1 enabling Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/gt: Skip aperture remapping selftest where there is no aperture Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 14:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/selftests: Only query RAPL for integrated power measurements Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915: Create stolen memory region from local memory Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:01 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-16 15:04 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-19 14:15 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/stolen: treat stolen local as normal " Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/stolen: enforce the min_page_size contract Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/stolen: pass the allocation flags Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-16 13:53 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/fbdev: Use lmem physical addresses for fb_mmap() on discrete Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 15:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915: Return error value when bo not in LMEM for discrete Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/lmem: Fail driver init if LMEM training failed Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/dg1: Fix mapping type for default state object Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915: Update the helper to set correct mapping Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-14 16:20 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-15 8:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-15 9:23 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-15 11:05 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-19 11:30 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-19 14:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-19 14:37 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-19 15:01 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-04-21 11:42 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-21 15:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-21 19:13 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-26 8:57 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-26 9:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/lmem: Bypass aperture when lmem is available Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-16 14:25 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-19 14:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/dg1: Read OPROM via SPI controller Matthew Auld
2021-09-17 23:29 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/oprom: Basic sanitization Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 22:36 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-12 22:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/oprom: fix memdup.cocci warnings kernel test robot
2021-05-17 11:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/oprom: Basic sanitization Jani Nikula
2021-09-18 4:30 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-09-20 7:41 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-20 8:04 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-09-20 8:43 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-22 21:53 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915: WA for zero memory channel Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 16:57 ` Souza, Jose
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/dg1: Compute MEM Bandwidth using MCHBAR Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/dg1: Double memory bandwidth available Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/gtt: map the PD up front Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 15:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12 16:01 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-12 16:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12 16:08 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-13 9:28 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-13 10:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/gtt/dgfx: place the PD in LMEM Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12 11:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for More DG1 enabling Patchwork
2021-04-12 11:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-04-12 11:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-04-12 13:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b108dc9-b03c-2f9c-0d44-cb672daec9ae@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.william.auld@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox