public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	 Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	 Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	 Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	 Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	 intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	 dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [BUG 5.15-rc3] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c:245!
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 10:10:40 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bad278d-ff81-21aa-48a-b46b9453b2b@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whJsD3RaqpmAMv7yjpnQqrEuXvibXZZDY7f-nzO+PvULg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 2 Oct 2021, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 5:17 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 03:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes (though bisection doesn't work right on this one): the fix
> >
> > Interesting, as it appeared to be very reliable. But I didn't do the
> > "try before / after" on the patch.
> 
> Well, even the before/after might well have worked, since the problem
> depended on how that sw_fence_dummy_notify() function ended up
> aligned. So random unrelated changes could re-align it just by
> mistake.

Yup.

> 
> Patch applied directly.

Great, thanks a lot.

> 
> I'd also like to point out how that BUG_ON() actually made things
> worse, and made this harder to debug. If it had been a WARN_ON_ONCE(),
> this would presumably not even have needed bisecting, it would have
> been obvious.
> 
> BUG_ON() really is pretty much *always* the wrong thing to do. It
> onl;y results in problems being harder to see because you end up with
> a dead machine and the message is often hidden.

Jani made the same point. But I guess they then went off into the weeds
of how to recover when warning, that the fix itself did not progress.

Hugh

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-02 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-02  6:02 [Intel-gfx] [BUG 5.15-rc3] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c:245! Steven Rostedt
2021-10-02 10:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-10-02 12:17   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-02 16:49     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-02 17:10       ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2021-10-04  7:39         ` Jani Nikula
2021-10-02 10:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-10-02 11:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-02 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7bad278d-ff81-21aa-48a-b46b9453b2b@google.com \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=caz.yokoyama@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox