From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Protect i915_active iterators from the shrinker
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:13:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86b7d1e0-8d6d-f9a2-a3d2-bb9014785af0@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208134704.23039-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 08/02/2019 13:47, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If we allocate while iterating the rbtree of active nodes, we may hit
> the shrinker and so retire the i915_active reap the rbtree. Modifying
> the rbtree as we iterate is not good behaviour, so acquire the
> i915_active first to keep the tree intact whenever we allocate.
>
> Fixes: a42375af0a30 ("drm/i915: Release the active tracker tree upon idling")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index 215b6ff8aa73..db7bb5bd5add 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -163,17 +163,25 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
> struct i915_request *rq)
> {
> struct i915_active_request *active;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + /* Prevent reaping in case we malloc/wait while building the tree */
> + i915_active_acquire(ref);
>
> active = active_instance(ref, timeline);
> - if (IS_ERR(active))
> - return PTR_ERR(active);
> + if (IS_ERR(active)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(active);
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> if (!i915_active_request_isset(active))
> ref->count++;
> __i915_active_request_set(active, rq);
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(!ref->count);
> - return 0;
> +out:
> + i915_active_release(ref);
> + return err;
> }
>
> bool i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref)
> @@ -223,19 +231,25 @@ int i915_request_await_active_request(struct i915_request *rq,
> int i915_request_await_active(struct i915_request *rq, struct i915_active *ref)
> {
> struct active_node *it, *n;
> - int ret;
> + int err = 0;
>
> - ret = i915_request_await_active_request(rq, &ref->last);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + /* await allocates and so we need to avoid hitting the shrinker */
> + if (i915_active_acquire(ref))
> + goto out; /* was idle */
> +
> + err = i915_request_await_active_request(rq, &ref->last);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
>
> rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(it, n, &ref->tree, node) {
> - ret = i915_request_await_active_request(rq, &it->base);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + err = i915_request_await_active_request(rq, &it->base);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> +out:
> + i915_active_release(ref);
> + return err;
> }
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM)
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 13:47 [PATCH] drm/i915: Protect i915_active iterators from the shrinker Chris Wilson
2019-02-08 14:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2019-02-08 16:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-02-11 11:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-02-11 12:50 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86b7d1e0-8d6d-f9a2-a3d2-bb9014785af0@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox