From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:52:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qkigabf.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230405071951.1258132-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Type-C PHYs are taking longer than expected for Aux IO Power Enabling.
> Workaround: Increase the timeout.
>
> WA_14017248603: adlp
> Bspec: 55480
>
> ---v2
> -change style on how we mention WA [Ankit]
> -fix bat error
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> .../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> index 62bafcbc7937..52f595929a18 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> @@ -489,6 +489,34 @@ static void icl_tc_cold_exit(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> "succeeded");
> }
>
> +static void
> +adl_aux_wait_for_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct i915_power_well *power_well,
> + bool timeout_expected)
> +{
> + const struct i915_power_well_regs *regs = power_well->desc->ops->regs;
> + enum phy phy = icl_aux_pw_to_phy(i915, power_well);
> + int pw_idx = i915_power_well_instance(power_well)->hsw.idx;
> +
> + /*
> + * WA_14017248603: adlp
> + * Type-C Phy are taking longer than expected for AUX IO Power Enabling.
> + * Increase timeout to 500ms.
> + */
> + if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915) && intel_phy_is_tc(i915, phy)) {
> + if (intel_de_wait_for_set(i915, regs->driver,
> + HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_STATE(pw_idx), 500)) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s power well enable timeout\n",
> + intel_power_well_name(power_well));
> +
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !timeout_expected);
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + hsw_wait_for_power_well_enable(i915, power_well, timeout_expected);
> +}
Please don't duplicate the function and the wait like this.
Something like this is sufficient:
@@ -252,7 +252,9 @@ static void hsw_wait_for_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
bool timeout_expected)
{
const struct i915_power_well_regs *regs = power_well->desc->ops->regs;
+ enum phy phy = icl_aux_pw_to_phy(i915, power_well);
int pw_idx = i915_power_well_instance(power_well)->hsw.idx;
+ int timeout = 1;
/*
* For some power wells we're not supposed to watch the status bit for
@@ -264,9 +266,13 @@ static void hsw_wait_for_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return;
}
+ /* WA_14017248603: adlp */
+ if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915) && intel_phy_is_tc(i915, phy))
+ timeout = 500;
+
/* Timeout for PW1:10 us, AUX:not specified, other PWs:20 us. */
if (intel_de_wait_for_set(dev_priv, regs->driver,
- HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_STATE(pw_idx), 1)) {
+ HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_STATE(pw_idx), timeout)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "%s power well enable timeout\n",
intel_power_well_name(power_well));
> +
> static void
> icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> @@ -517,7 +545,7 @@ icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11 && intel_tc_cold_requires_aux_pw(dig_port))
> icl_tc_cold_exit(dev_priv);
>
> - hsw_wait_for_power_well_enable(dev_priv, power_well, timeout_expected);
> + adl_aux_wait_for_power_well_enable(dev_priv, power_well, timeout_expected);
A function prefixed adl_ should indicate it's only needed for adl+. This
change is misleading.
BR,
Jani.
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12 && !is_tbt) {
> enum tc_port tc_port;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-17 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-03 8:01 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C Suraj Kandpal
2023-04-03 10:11 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-04-03 14:58 ` Murthy, Arun R
2023-04-04 5:40 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-03 15:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-04-05 7:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Suraj Kandpal
2023-04-17 4:30 ` Murthy, Arun R
2023-04-17 6:51 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-17 7:33 ` Murthy, Arun R
2023-04-17 8:52 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-04-17 10:18 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-17 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-17 10:51 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-17 10:56 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-17 11:00 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-17 11:15 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-17 11:27 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-17 11:39 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-17 11:43 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-17 11:53 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-17 12:25 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-17 12:29 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-18 5:02 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-18 6:44 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-05 19:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C (rev2) Patchwork
2023-04-06 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-04-17 15:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C (rev3) Patchwork
2023-04-17 15:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-17 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-04-18 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C Suraj Kandpal
2023-04-18 10:00 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 10:10 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-18 10:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] " Suraj Kandpal
2023-04-18 10:54 ` Suraj Kandpal
2023-04-18 11:03 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-18 11:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-04-18 12:41 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-18 11:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C (rev6) Patchwork
2023-04-18 11:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-04-18 13:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C (rev7) Patchwork
2023-04-18 13:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C Suraj Kandpal
2023-04-19 12:28 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-18 14:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Increase AUX timeout for Type-C (rev8) Patchwork
2023-04-18 14:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-18 17:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qkigabf.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox