From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 12:54:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871seazjx6.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516210909.GE2730@intel.com>
On Wed, 16 May 2018, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> This reverts commit c0cfb10d9e1de490e36d3b9d4228c0ea0ca30677.
>>
>> This fails on a Dell XPS13 9350 machine giving me just a black screen.
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>>
>> On a working kernel, previous to this commit I have:
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 270000, Lane count = 4
>>
>> Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I'm sending this for reference and discussion only, but it doesn't seem
>> to be the right fix. Not only because it would mean IGT failing on CI,
>> but also because we seem to be having several link training running
>> concurrently and the last one failing leaves the panel at that state.
>
> I just looked at the full log of the failing case and in that case it
> first tries training at the highest link rate, lane count for eDP and
> passes before enabling pipe A. But then the panel soon sends a short
> pulse indicating loss of signal which causes the driver to call
> intel_dp_check_link_status() where drm_dp_channel_eq_ok() check fails
> and thats why you see multiple link training attempts there which fail
> and eventually result in a black screen.
We also have a bug [1] where the link training succeeds after the hpd,
but the display starts to flicker.
[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105267
> Now in case of passing case, whats interesting is that it starts with
> same highest link rate 5.4Gbps but fails the very first time and now
> the fallback code kicks in and lowers the link rate to 2.7Gbps. Now
> in this particular case, the edp panel's native resolution of 3200 x
> 1800 fits even for the lowered link rate of 2.7Gbps and it retrains at
> that and passes so we get a recovered modeset.
>
> So I am thinking because of such cases, we should probably not asusme
> that the native mode will not fit the lowered fallback link rate. So I
> guess we should still try fallback for eDP as long as its not pruning
> the native mode on the panel.
>
> Alternatively I think if we start from lowest link rate and lane count
> like we do for DP then it will pick the lowest possible link rate
> required for the native mode and we might not run into this situation.
>
> Jani, Ville any thoughts on which approach should be chosen?
See [2].
BR,
Jani.
[2] http://marc.info/?i=87sh6qzqpp.fsf@intel.com
>
> Regards
> Manasi
>
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 26 +++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
>> index f59b59bb0a21..78f1fe934da3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
>> @@ -330,22 +330,14 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> return;
>>
>> failure_handling:
>> - /* Dont fallback and prune modes if its eDP */
>> - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
>> - intel_connector->base.base.id,
>> - intel_connector->base.name,
>> - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>> - if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
>> - intel_dp->link_rate,
>> - intel_dp->lane_count))
>> - /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
>> - schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
>> - } else {
>> - DRM_ERROR("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
>> - intel_connector->base.base.id,
>> - intel_connector->base.name,
>> - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>> - }
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
>> + intel_connector->base.base.id,
>> + intel_connector->base.name,
>> + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>> + if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
>> + intel_dp->link_rate,
>> + intel_dp->lane_count))
>> + /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
>> + schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
>> return;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.0
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
2018-05-16 17:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-05-16 17:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-16 21:09 ` [PATCH] " Manasi Navare
2018-05-17 9:54 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-05-17 2:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
2018-05-17 7:20 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2018-05-18 12:13 ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-18 12:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2) Patchwork
2018-05-18 12:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-18 16:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871seazjx6.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox