Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	kai.chen@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Remove decoupled MMIO code
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:05:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sr6lt7u.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c1b9010-afe5-f4d9-b58d-c926f4777651@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 24 May 2017, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 23/05/2017 22:58, kai.chen@intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kai Chen <kai.chen@intel.com>
>>
>> This is a follow-up patch to the previous patch ([PATCH[1/2] drm/i915:
>> Disable decoupled MMIO) to remove the dead code for decoupled MMIO
>> implementation, as it won't be used any longer on GEN9LP.
>>
>> Therefore, this patch reverts:
>>
>> commit 85ee17ebeedd1af0dccd98f82ab4e644e29d84c0
>> Author: Praveen Paneri <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
>> Date:   Tue Nov 15 22:49:20 2016 +0530
>>
>>     drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai Chen <kai.chen@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |   3 -
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |   7 --
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 126 ------------------------------------
>>  3 files changed, 136 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index a6f2047..41ff031 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -703,7 +703,6 @@ struct intel_csr {
>>  	func(has_aliasing_ppgtt); \
>>  	func(has_csr); \
>>  	func(has_ddi); \
>> -	func(has_decoupled_mmio); \
>>  	func(has_dp_mst); \
>>  	func(has_fbc); \
>>  	func(has_fpga_dbg); \
>> @@ -2944,8 +2943,6 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
>>  #define GEN9_FREQ_SCALER 3
>>
>> -#define HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_decoupled_mmio)
>> -
>>  #include "i915_trace.h"
>>
>>  static inline bool intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index ee144ec..78872f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -7792,13 +7792,6 @@ enum {
>>  #define  SKL_FUSE_PG1_DIST_STATUS              (1<<26)
>>  #define  SKL_FUSE_PG2_DIST_STATUS              (1<<25)
>>
>> -/* Decoupled MMIO register pair for kernel driver */
>> -#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0			_MMIO(0xF00)
>> -#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1			_MMIO(0xF04)
>> -#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO			(1<<31)
>> -#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_SHIFT			28
>> -#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_SHIFT			24
>> -
>>  /* Per-pipe DDI Function Control */
>>  #define _TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_A		0x60400
>>  #define _TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_B		0x61400
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> index a9a6933..3901800 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> @@ -400,8 +400,6 @@ check_for_unclaimed_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  static void __intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  					  bool restore_forcewake)
>>  {
>> -	struct intel_device_info *info = mkwrite_device_info(dev_priv);
>> -
>>  	/* clear out unclaimed reg detection bit */
>>  	if (check_for_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv))
>>  		DRM_DEBUG("unclaimed mmio detected on uncore init, clearing\n");
>> @@ -414,9 +412,6 @@ static void __intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  				   GT_FIFO_CTL_RC6_POLICY_STALL);
>>  	}
>>
>> -	if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_B_LAST))
>> -		info->has_decoupled_mmio = false;
>> -
>>  	intel_uncore_forcewake_reset(dev_priv, restore_forcewake);
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -801,78 +796,6 @@ unclaimed_reg_debug(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  	__unclaimed_reg_debug(dev_priv, reg, read, before);
>>  }
>>
>> -enum decoupled_power_domain {
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_BLITTER = 0,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_RENDER,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_MEDIA,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL
>> -};
>> -
>> -enum decoupled_ops {
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_WRITE = 0,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_READ
>> -};
>> -
>> -static const enum decoupled_power_domain fw2dpd_domain[] = {
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_RENDER,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_BLITTER,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_MEDIA,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
>> -	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL
>> -};
>> -
>> -/*
>> - * Decoupled MMIO access for only 1 DWORD
>> - */
>> -static void __gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> -					 u32 reg,
>> -					 enum forcewake_domains fw_domain,
>> -					 enum decoupled_ops operation)
>> -{
>> -	enum decoupled_power_domain dp_domain;
>> -	u32 ctrl_reg_data = 0;
>> -
>> -	dp_domain = fw2dpd_domain[fw_domain - 1];
>> -
>> -	ctrl_reg_data |= reg;
>> -	ctrl_reg_data |= (operation << GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_SHIFT);
>> -	ctrl_reg_data |= (dp_domain << GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_SHIFT);
>> -	ctrl_reg_data |= GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO;
>> -	__raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1, ctrl_reg_data);
>> -
>> -	if (wait_for_atomic((__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv,
>> -			    GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1) &
>> -			    GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO) == 0,
>> -			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS))
>> -		DRM_ERROR("Decoupled MMIO wait timed out\n");
>> -}
>> -
>> -static inline u32
>> -__gen9_decoupled_mmio_read32(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> -			     u32 reg,
>> -			     enum forcewake_domains fw_domain)
>> -{
>> -	__gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(dev_priv, reg, fw_domain,
>> -				     GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_READ);
>> -
>> -	return __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static inline void
>> -__gen9_decoupled_mmio_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> -			    u32 reg, u32 data,
>> -			    enum forcewake_domains fw_domain)
>> -{
>> -
>> -	__raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0, data);
>> -
>> -	__gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(dev_priv, reg, fw_domain,
>> -				     GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_WRITE);
>> -}
>> -
>> -
>>  #define GEN2_READ_HEADER(x) \
>>  	u##x val = 0; \
>>  	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
>> @@ -969,28 +892,6 @@ func##_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) {
>>  #define __gen6_read(x) __gen_read(gen6, x)
>>  #define __fwtable_read(x) __gen_read(fwtable, x)
>>
>> -#define __gen9_decoupled_read(x) \
>> -static u##x \
>> -gen9_decoupled_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, \
>> -		       i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) { \
>> -	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
>> -	GEN6_READ_HEADER(x); \
>> -	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(offset); \
>> -	if (fw_engine & ~dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active) { \
>> -		unsigned i; \
>> -		u32 *ptr_data = (u32 *) &val; \
>> -		for (i = 0; i < x/32; i++, offset += sizeof(u32), ptr_data++) \
>> -			*ptr_data = __gen9_decoupled_mmio_read32(dev_priv, \
>> -								 offset, \
>> -								 fw_engine); \
>> -	} else { \
>> -		val = __raw_i915_read##x(dev_priv, reg); \
>> -	} \
>> -	GEN6_READ_FOOTER; \
>> -}
>> -
>> -__gen9_decoupled_read(32)
>> -__gen9_decoupled_read(64)
>>  __fwtable_read(8)
>>  __fwtable_read(16)
>>  __fwtable_read(32)
>> @@ -1077,25 +978,6 @@ func##_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, boo
>>  #define __gen8_write(x) __gen_write(gen8, x)
>>  #define __fwtable_write(x) __gen_write(fwtable, x)
>>
>> -#define __gen9_decoupled_write(x) \
>> -static void \
>> -gen9_decoupled_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, \
>> -			i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, \
>> -		bool trace) { \
>> -	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
>> -	GEN6_WRITE_HEADER; \
>> -	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(offset); \
>> -	if (fw_engine & ~dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active) \
>> -		__gen9_decoupled_mmio_write(dev_priv, \
>> -					    offset, \
>> -					    val, \
>> -					    fw_engine); \
>> -	else \
>> -		__raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
>> -	GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
>> -}
>> -
>> -__gen9_decoupled_write(32)
>>  __fwtable_write(8)
>>  __fwtable_write(16)
>>  __fwtable_write(32)
>> @@ -1332,14 +1214,6 @@ void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(__gen9_fw_ranges);
>>  		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(dev_priv, fwtable);
>>  		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(dev_priv, fwtable);
>> -		if (HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO(dev_priv)) {
>> -			dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl =
>> -						gen9_decoupled_read32;
>> -			dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readq =
>> -						gen9_decoupled_read64;
>> -			dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel =
>> -						gen9_decoupled_write32;
>> -		}
>>  	}
>>
>>  	iosf_mbi_register_pmic_bus_access_notifier(
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Thanks for sorting this out!

Both pushed to dinq, thanks for the patches and review.

BR,
Jani.



>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-30  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-23 21:58 [PATCH 0/2] Disable and remove decoupled MMIO feature kai.chen
2017-05-23 21:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Disable decoupled MMIO kai.chen
2017-05-24  9:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-05-23 21:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Remove decoupled MMIO code kai.chen
2017-05-24  9:08   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-05-30  7:05     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-05-23 22:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Disable and remove decoupled MMIO feature Patchwork
2017-05-24  5:33   ` Saarinen, Jani
2017-05-24  8:54 ` Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871sr6lt7u.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kai.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox