From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: vinod.govindapillai@intel.com, ville.syrjala@intel.com,
jani.saarinen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/display: update intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask to use intel_display
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:52:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734k6hxjp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105071600.235338-2-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024, Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> wrote:
> Update intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask to use intel_display instead
> of drm_i915_private object. This is a prepratory patch for the next
> patch in the series, where all intel_de_read calls in skl_watermarks.c
> are updated to use intel_display instead of drm_i915_private.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 9 +++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 2766fd9208b0..62e0faffca40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ static void gen9_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> u8 slices_mask;
>
> dev_priv->display.dbuf.enabled_slices =
> - intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(dev_priv);
> + intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(&dev_priv->display);
Please add a local struct intel_display *display variable and pass that
to intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask().
The point is, all of the i915/dev_priv references need to go, and if you
add &dev_priv->display, this line needs to be updated again.
>
> slices_mask = BIT(DBUF_S1) | dev_priv->display.dbuf.enabled_slices;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> index f0131dd853de..f792db191fcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> @@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static bool gen9_dc_off_power_well_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> static void gen9_assert_dbuf_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - u8 hw_enabled_dbuf_slices = intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(dev_priv);
> + u8 hw_enabled_dbuf_slices = intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(&dev_priv->display);
Ditto.
> u8 enabled_dbuf_slices = dev_priv->display.dbuf.enabled_slices;
>
> drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index 3b0e87edbacf..d9d7238f0fb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -52,13 +52,13 @@ struct skl_wm_params {
> u32 dbuf_block_size;
> };
>
> -u8 intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +u8 intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> u8 enabled_slices = 0;
> enum dbuf_slice slice;
>
> - for_each_dbuf_slice(i915, slice) {
> - if (intel_de_read(i915, DBUF_CTL_S(slice)) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)
> + for_each_dbuf_slice(display, slice) {
> + if (intel_de_read(display, DBUF_CTL_S(slice)) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)
> enabled_slices |= BIT(slice);
> }
>
> @@ -3126,6 +3126,7 @@ void intel_wm_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
Please prefer putting the display variable first if at all possible.
> const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> struct skl_hw_state {
> @@ -3149,7 +3150,7 @@ void intel_wm_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> skl_pipe_ddb_get_hw_state(crtc, hw->ddb, hw->ddb_y);
>
> - hw_enabled_slices = intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(i915);
> + hw_enabled_slices = intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(display);
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11 &&
> hw_enabled_slices != i915->display.dbuf.enabled_slices)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> index e73baec94873..990793e36272 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> @@ -17,11 +17,12 @@ struct intel_atomic_state;
> struct intel_bw_state;
> struct intel_crtc;
> struct intel_crtc_state;
> +struct intel_display;
> struct intel_plane;
> struct skl_pipe_wm;
> struct skl_wm_level;
>
> -u8 intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +u8 intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(struct intel_display *display);
>
> void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 7:15 [PATCH 0/8] use hw support for min/interim ddb allocation for async flip Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-05 7:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/display: update intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask to use intel_display Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-05 8:52 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-11-05 9:07 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2024-11-05 7:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i9i5/display: use intel_display in intel_de_read calls of skl_watermark.c Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-05 8:58 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-05 9:03 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-05 7:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/display: update use_minimal_wm0_only to use intel_display Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-05 9:08 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-06 14:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-11-06 15:49 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2024-11-05 7:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/display: update use_min_ddb " Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-05 7:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/display: update skl_plane_wm_equals " Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-05 9:09 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-05 7:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/display: update to plane_wm register access function Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-05 7:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/xe3: Use hw support for min/interim ddb allocations for async flip Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-06 22:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-11-20 22:26 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2024-11-05 7:16 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/debugfs: add dbuf alloc status as part of i915_ddb_info Vinod Govindapillai
2024-11-06 22:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-11-20 22:30 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2024-11-05 8:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for use hw support for min/interim ddb allocation for async flip Patchwork
2024-11-05 8:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 9:11 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734k6hxjp.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
--cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox