Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: animesh.manna@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
	jouni.hogander@intel.com, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Implment WA to help reach PC10
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 14:09:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734pqba5u.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606082926.1816416-4-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>

On Thu, 06 Jun 2024, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> To reach PC10 when PKG_C_LATENCY is configure we must do the following
> things
> 1) Enter PSR1 only when delayed_vblank < 6 lines and DC5 can be entered
> 2) Allow PSR2 deep sleep when DC5 can be entered
> 3) DC5 can be entered when all transocoder have either PSR1, PSR2 or
> eDP 1.5 PR ALPM enabled and VBI is disabled and flips and pushes are
> not happening.
>
> WA: 16023497226
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 6fc88f6c6b26..b22745c019df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -811,12 +811,81 @@ static u8 psr_compute_idle_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	return idle_frames;
>  }
>  
> +static bool intel_psr_check_delayed_vblank_limit(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +						 enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> +{
> +	return intel_de_read(i915, TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY(cpu_transcoder)) >= 6;

Please don't use the hardware to preserve the state for you. It will get
really complicated to maintain.

> +}
> +
> +static bool intel_psr_is_dpkgc_configured(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	return intel_de_read(i915, LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY) == U32_MAX;

Ditto.

> +}
> +
> +static bool intel_psr_is_dc5_entry_possible(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	for_each_intel_crtc(&i915->drm, intel_crtc) {
> +		struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +		struct drm_crtc *crtc = &intel_crtc->base;
> +		enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> +
> +		if (!crtc->active)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!(i915->display.irq.de_irq_mask[pipe] & GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK))

You have no business looking directly at that. It's for display irq code
*only*.

> +			ret = false;
> +
> +		for_each_encoder_on_crtc(&i915->drm, crtc, encoder) {
> +			struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(_encoder);
> +			struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
> +
> +			if (!psr->enabled)
> +				ret = false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static bool wa_16023497226_check(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool psr1)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> +
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) != 20)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (is_dpkg_c_configured(i915)) {
> +		if (psr1 &&
> +		    (intel_psr_check_delayed_vblank_limit(i915, cpu_transcoder) ||
> +		     intel_psr_is_dc5_entry_possible(i915)))
> +			return true;
> +		else if (!psr1 && is_dc5_entry_possible(i915))
> +			return true;
> +		else
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static bool hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
>  	u32 max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
> -	u32 val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
> +	u32 val = 0;
> +
> +	/* WA: 16023497226*/
> +	if (wa_16023497226_check(intel_dp, true)) {
> +		val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
> +	} else {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR1 was not activated\n");

Please add reason.

> +		return false;
> +	}

Switch the condition around and use early return.

>  
>  	val |= EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAMES(psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
>  
> @@ -910,7 +979,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	u32 val = EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
>  	u32 psr_val = 0;
>  
> -	val |= EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAMES(psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
> +	/* WA: 16023497226*/
> +	if (wa_16023497226_check(intel_dp, false))
> +		val |= EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAMES(psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 14 && !IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>  		val |= EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-06  8:29 [PATCH 0/2] Implement WA to fix increased power usage Suraj Kandpal
2024-06-06  8:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Add return bool value for hsw_activate_psr1 Suraj Kandpal
2024-06-06  8:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Implment WA to help reach PC10 Suraj Kandpal
2024-06-06 11:09   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-06-10  4:54     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-06-14 13:41       ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-06 21:48   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-06 22:40   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-07  0:46   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-06  8:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Implement WA to fix increased power usage Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-19  4:37 [PATCH 0/2] " Suraj Kandpal
2024-06-19  4:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Implment WA to help reach PC10 Suraj Kandpal
2024-08-22  5:19   ` Shankar, Uma
2024-08-22  6:25     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-08-22  8:45   ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-08-23  4:54     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-08-23  5:24       ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-08-23  6:18         ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-08-23  7:20           ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-08-23  9:49             ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-08-23 10:00               ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-08-27  4:32                 ` Kandpal, Suraj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8734pqba5u.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox