From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>, Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: Lookup the i2c bus from ACPI NS only if CONFIG_ACPI=y (v3)
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:24:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736ceiavp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115205704.22674-1-vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com> wrote:
> Perform the i2c bus/adapter lookup from ACPI Namespace only if
> ACPI is enabled in the kernel config. If ACPI is not enabled or if
> the lookup fails, we'll fallback to using the VBT for identiying
> the i2c bus.
>
> v2: Clearly identify the commit this patch is fixing (Jani)
>
> v3: Remove the i2c_bus_num >= 0 check from the adapter lookup function
> as this would prevent ACPI bus number override. This check was mainly
> there to return early if the bus number has already been found but we
> anyway return in the next line if the slave address does not match.
>
> Fixes: 8cbf89db2941 ("drm/i915/dsi: Parse the I2C element from the VBT MIPI sequence block (v3)")
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Cc: Nabendu Maiti <nabendu.bikash.maiti@intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Cc: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 50 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> index 89fb0d90b694..04f953ba8f00 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> return data;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> static int i2c_adapter_lookup(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> {
> struct i2c_adapter_lookup *lookup = data;
> @@ -393,8 +394,7 @@ static int i2c_adapter_lookup(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> acpi_handle adapter_handle;
> acpi_status status;
>
> - if (intel_dsi->i2c_bus_num >= 0 ||
> - !i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb))
> + if (!i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb))
> return 1;
The above hunk turns v3 of the patch from a straightforward build fix
into a functional change. They *must* be separate.
I've pushed v2 into drm-intel-next-queued, please send the above change
as a standalone fix that it rightly is, with its own commit message and
rationale.
BR,
Jani.
>
> if (lookup->slave_addr != sb->slave_address)
> @@ -413,14 +413,41 @@ static int i2c_adapter_lookup(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static const u8 *mipi_exec_i2c(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> +static void i2c_acpi_find_adapter(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
> + const u16 slave_addr)
> {
> struct drm_device *drm_dev = intel_dsi->base.base.dev;
> struct device *dev = &drm_dev->pdev->dev;
> - struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
> struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
> struct list_head resource_list;
> struct i2c_adapter_lookup lookup;
> +
> + acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> + if (acpi_dev) {
> + memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
> + lookup.slave_addr = slave_addr;
> + lookup.intel_dsi = intel_dsi;
> + lookup.dev_handle = acpi_device_handle(acpi_dev);
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> + acpi_dev_get_resources(acpi_dev, &resource_list,
> + i2c_adapter_lookup,
> + &lookup);
> + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> + }
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void i2c_acpi_find_adapter(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
> + const u16 slave_addr)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static const u8 *mipi_exec_i2c(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *drm_dev = intel_dsi->base.base.dev;
> + struct device *dev = &drm_dev->pdev->dev;
> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
> struct i2c_msg msg;
> int ret;
> u8 vbt_i2c_bus_num = *(data + 2);
> @@ -431,20 +458,7 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_i2c(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
>
> if (intel_dsi->i2c_bus_num < 0) {
> intel_dsi->i2c_bus_num = vbt_i2c_bus_num;
> -
> - acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> - if (acpi_dev) {
> - memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
> - lookup.slave_addr = slave_addr;
> - lookup.intel_dsi = intel_dsi;
> - lookup.dev_handle = acpi_device_handle(acpi_dev);
> -
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> - acpi_dev_get_resources(acpi_dev, &resource_list,
> - i2c_adapter_lookup,
> - &lookup);
> - acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> - }
> + i2c_acpi_find_adapter(intel_dsi, slave_addr);
> }
>
> adapter = i2c_get_adapter(intel_dsi->i2c_bus_num);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-17 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 1:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: Lookup the i2c bus from ACPI NS only if CONFIG_ACPI=y (v2) Vivek Kasireddy
2020-01-15 2:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-01-15 2:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2020-01-15 8:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2020-01-15 20:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: Lookup the i2c bus from ACPI NS only if CONFIG_ACPI=y (v3) Vivek Kasireddy
2020-01-17 11:24 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-01-15 22:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dsi: Lookup the i2c bus from ACPI NS only if CONFIG_ACPI=y (v2) (rev2) Patchwork
2020-01-15 22:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2020-01-17 7:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dsi: Lookup the i2c bus from ACPI NS only if CONFIG_ACPI=y (v2) Patchwork
2020-01-18 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dsi: Lookup the i2c bus from ACPI NS only if CONFIG_ACPI=y (v2) (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8736ceiavp.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=hulkci@huawei.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox