Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Only enqueue already completed requests
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:25:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874l2uid5e.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190806134725.25321-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> If we are asked to submit a completed request, just move it onto the
> active-list without modifying it's payload.
>

If the seqno is there then there is no need to write
it yes.

But I am not at all certain that I deduced the 'why'
part correctly so please spell it out.

-Mika


> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index 8ac7d14ec8c9..69fc66bd1125 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ void __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request)
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&engine->active.lock);
>  
> +	if (i915_request_completed(request))
> +		goto xfer;
> +
>  	if (i915_gem_context_is_banned(request->gem_context))
>  		i915_request_skip(request, -EIO);
>  
> @@ -420,7 +423,13 @@ void __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request)
>  	    i915_sw_fence_signaled(&request->semaphore))
>  		engine->saturated |= request->sched.semaphores;
>  
> +	engine->emit_fini_breadcrumb(request,
> +				     request->ring->vaddr + request->postfix);
> +
> +	engine->serial++;
> +
>  	/* We may be recursing from the signal callback of another i915 fence */
> +xfer:
>  	spin_lock_nested(&request->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>  
>  	list_move_tail(&request->sched.link, &engine->active.requests);
> @@ -437,11 +446,6 @@ void __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request)
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&request->lock);
>  
> -	engine->emit_fini_breadcrumb(request,
> -				     request->ring->vaddr + request->postfix);
> -
> -	engine->serial++;
> -
>  	trace_i915_request_execute(request);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.23.0.rc1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-06 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-06 13:47 [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Only enqueue already completed requests Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/execlists: Force preemption Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Mark up "sentinel" requests Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 14:29   ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-08-06 14:47     ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 13:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/execlists: Cancel banned contexts on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 13:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 14:11   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 14:26   ` Bloomfield, Jon
2019-08-06 14:41     ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-07 13:22   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-07 14:04     ` Bloomfield, Jon
2019-08-07 14:14       ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-07 14:33         ` Bloomfield, Jon
2019-08-07 15:08           ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-07 15:29             ` Bloomfield, Jon
2019-08-07 15:38               ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-07 16:51               ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-07 17:12                 ` Bloomfield, Jon
2019-08-09 23:34   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-12 14:39     ` Bloomfield, Jon
2019-08-12 14:51       ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 14:25 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2019-08-06 14:44   ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Only enqueue already completed requests Chris Wilson
2019-08-06 14:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/5] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874l2uid5e.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox