From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/pmu: add event_to_pmu() helper
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:13:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875y2n5f3y.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTpGWZn2cm1VhUVN@ashyti-mobl2.lan>
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:51:02AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> Now seriously, I don't mind perf_event, as long as _whole_ i915_pmu.c is
>> switched over. At which point I questioned would the churn be worth it.
>
> I like Jani's patch, of course your grep search concludes the
> the discussion, so that I'm not going to argue agains "event"
> as name :-)
>
> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Thanks. Pushed with the original patch; if someone feels inclined to
change the naming, patches are, as always, welcome.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-31 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-23 15:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/pmu: add pmu_to_i915() helper Jani Nikula
2023-10-23 15:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/pmu: add event_to_pmu() helper Jani Nikula
2023-10-24 12:29 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-24 12:42 ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-25 10:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-10-25 10:29 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-26 10:22 ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-26 10:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-10-26 10:36 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-26 10:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-10-26 10:58 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-31 9:13 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-10-24 12:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/pmu: add perf_event_to_pmu() helper Jani Nikula
2023-10-23 15:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/pmu: rearrange hrtimer pointer chasing Jani Nikula
2023-10-24 12:30 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-24 12:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/pmu: add pmu_to_i915() helper Andi Shyti
2023-10-25 0:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/pmu: add pmu_to_i915() helper (rev2) Patchwork
2023-10-27 0:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/pmu: add pmu_to_i915() helper (rev3) Patchwork
2023-10-27 19:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/pmu: add pmu_to_i915() helper (rev4) Patchwork
2023-10-30 4:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875y2n5f3y.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox