From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: venkata.sai.patnana@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/display/dsc: Add Per connector debugfs node for DSC BPP enable
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:35:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875yxwspqg.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210629065156.30301-2-venkata.sai.patnana@intel.com>
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, venkata.sai.patnana@intel.com wrote:
> From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
>
> DSC can be supported per DP connector. This patch creates
> a per connector debugfs node to expose the Input and
> Compressed BPP.
>
> The same node can be used from userspace to force
> DSC to a certain BPP.
>
> force_dsc_bpp is written through this debugfs
> node to force DSC BPP to all accepted values
This commit message only describes the "what". It's nice and helpful to
summarize the code changes.
But the key question the commit message must answer is "why". Why are
you doing this? Why do we need this?
This looks like it complicates code that is already complicated to add a
debugfs. There needs to be a justification if it isn't obvious.
A couple of comments inline.
>
> Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
> Cc: Navare Manasi D <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patnana Venkata Sai <venkata.sai.patnana@intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index af9e58619667d..6dc223227eeaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -2389,6 +2389,100 @@ static const struct file_operations i915_dsc_fec_support_fops = {
> .write = i915_dsc_fec_support_write
> };
>
> +static int i915_dsc_bpp_support_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> +{
> + struct drm_connector *connector = m->private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
> + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state = NULL;
> + int ret = 0;
> + bool try_again = false;
> +
> + drm_modeset_acquire_init(&ctx, DRM_MODESET_ACQUIRE_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +
> + do {
> + try_again = false;
> + ret = drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex,
> + &ctx);
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + break;
> + }
> + crtc = connector->state->crtc;
> + if (connector->status != connector_status_connected || !crtc) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + break;
> + }
> + ret = drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, &ctx);
> + if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
> + ret = drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx);
> + if (!ret) {
> + try_again = true;
> + continue;
> + }
> + break;
> + } else if (ret) {
> + break;
> + }
> + intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(to_intel_connector(connector));
> + crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> + seq_printf(m, "Input_BPP: %d\n", crtc_state->pipe_bpp);
> + seq_printf(m, "Compressed_BPP: %d\n",
> + crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp);
> + } while (try_again);
> +
> + drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
> + drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
> +
> + return ret;
Looks like copy-paste from i915_dsc_fec_support_show() which already
makes me cringe. We can't keep accumulating this kind of code in
debugfs.
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t i915_dsc_bpp_support_write(struct file *file,
> + const char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t len, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + int dsc_bpp = 0;
> + int ret;
> + struct drm_connector *connector =
> + ((struct seq_file *)file->private_data)->private;
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder = intel_attached_encoder(to_intel_connector(connector));
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +
> + if (len == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> + "Copied %zu bytes from user to force BPP\n", len);
Just no. Again, copy-paste from the fec stuff that we shouldn't have to
begin with.
> +
> + ret = kstrtoint_from_user(ubuf, len, 0, &dsc_bpp);
> +
> + intel_dp->force_dsc_bpp = dsc_bpp;
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
Check the errors before using the data!
Also, how are you prepared for fractional bpp?
> +
> + *offp += len;
> + return len;
> +}
> +
> +static int i915_dsc_bpp_support_open(struct inode *inode,
> + struct file *file)
> +{
> + return single_open(file, i915_dsc_bpp_support_show,
> + inode->i_private);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations i915_dsc_bpp_support_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .open = i915_dsc_bpp_support_open,
> + .read = seq_read,
> + .llseek = seq_lseek,
> + .release = single_release,
> + .write = i915_dsc_bpp_support_write
> +};
> +
> /**
> * intel_connector_debugfs_add - add i915 specific connector debugfs files
> * @connector: pointer to a registered drm_connector
> @@ -2427,9 +2521,16 @@ int intel_connector_debugfs_add(struct drm_connector *connector)
> connector, &i915_hdcp_sink_capability_fops);
> }
>
> - if ((DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) && ((connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort && !to_intel_connector(connector)->mst_port) || connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP))
> + if ((DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
> + ((connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort &&
> + !to_intel_connector(connector)->mst_port) ||
> + connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)) {
> debugfs_create_file("i915_dsc_fec_support", S_IRUGO, root,
> connector, &i915_dsc_fec_support_fops);
> + debugfs_create_file("i915_dsc_bpp_support", S_IRUGO,
> + root, connector,
> + &i915_dsc_bpp_support_fops);
> + }
>
> /* Legacy panels doesn't lpsp on any platform */
> if ((DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9 || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) ||
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index d94f361b548b7..19d8d3eefbc27 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1612,6 +1612,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
>
> /* Display stream compression testing */
> bool force_dsc_en;
> + int force_dsc_bpp;
>
> bool hobl_failed;
> bool hobl_active;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-29 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-29 6:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/i915/display/dsc: Set BPP in the kernel venkata.sai.patnana
2021-06-29 6:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/display/dsc: Add Per connector debugfs node for DSC BPP enable venkata.sai.patnana
2021-06-29 14:35 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-06-30 6:29 ` Patnana, Venkata Sai
2021-06-30 13:24 ` Patnana, Venkata Sai
2021-07-01 9:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [v3 " venkata.sai.patnana
2021-06-29 6:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/display/dsc: Set BPP in the kernel venkata.sai.patnana
2021-06-29 7:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display/dsc: Set BPP in the kernel (rev2) Patchwork
2021-06-29 7:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-29 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-06-29 9:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-01 9:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [v3 1/2] drm/i915/display/dsc: Add Per connector debugfs node for DSC BPP enable venkata.sai.patnana
2021-07-01 9:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [v3 2/2] drm/i915/display/dsc: Set BPP in the kernel venkata.sai.patnana
2021-07-01 10:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [v4 0/2] " venkata.sai.patnana
2021-07-01 10:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [v4 1/2] drm/i915/display/dsc: Add Per connector debugfs node for DSC BPP enable venkata.sai.patnana
2021-07-01 10:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [v4 2/2] drm/i915/display/dsc: Set BPP in the kernel venkata.sai.patnana
2021-07-01 10:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display/dsc: Set BPP in the kernel (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-01 10:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-01 11:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875yxwspqg.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=venkata.sai.patnana@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox