From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Simplify intel_cx0_program_phy_lane() with loop
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:04:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cqgxryr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725212716.3060259-3-gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> wrote:
> It is possible to generalize the "disable" value for the transmitters to
> be a bit mask based on the port width and the port reversal boolean,
> with a small exception for DP-alt mode with "x1" port width.
>
> Simplify the code by using such a mask and a for-loop instead of using
> switch-case statements.
>
> BSpec: 64539
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 79 +++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> index b903ceb0b56a..f10ebdfd696a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> @@ -2604,7 +2604,8 @@ static void intel_cx0_program_phy_lane(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> struct intel_encoder *encoder, int lane_count,
> bool lane_reversal)
> {
> - u8 l0t1, l0t2, l1t1, l1t2;
> + int i;
> + u8 disables;
> bool dp_alt_mode = intel_tc_port_in_dp_alt_mode(enc_to_dig_port(encoder));
> enum port port = encoder->port;
>
> @@ -2614,66 +2615,26 @@ static void intel_cx0_program_phy_lane(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> C10_VDR_CTRL_MSGBUS_ACCESS,
> MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
>
> - /* TODO: DP-alt MFD case where only one PHY lane should be programmed. */
> - l0t1 = intel_cx0_read(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(1, 2));
> - l0t2 = intel_cx0_read(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(2, 2));
> - l1t1 = intel_cx0_read(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE1, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(1, 2));
> - l1t2 = intel_cx0_read(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE1, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(2, 2));
> -
> - l0t1 |= CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - l0t2 |= CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - l1t1 |= CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - l1t2 |= CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> -
> - if (lane_reversal) {
> - switch (lane_count) {
> - case 4:
> - l0t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - fallthrough;
> - case 3:
> - l0t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - fallthrough;
> - case 2:
> - l1t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - fallthrough;
> - case 1:
> - l1t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - break;
> - default:
> - MISSING_CASE(lane_count);
> - }
> - } else {
> - switch (lane_count) {
> - case 4:
> - l1t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - fallthrough;
> - case 3:
> - l1t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - fallthrough;
> - case 2:
> - l0t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - l0t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - break;
> - case 1:
> - if (dp_alt_mode)
> - l0t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - else
> - l0t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
> - break;
> - default:
> - MISSING_CASE(lane_count);
> - }
> + if (lane_reversal)
> + disables = REG_GENMASK8(3, 0) >> lane_count;
> + else
> + disables = REG_GENMASK8(3, 0) << lane_count;
> +
> + if (dp_alt_mode && lane_count == 1) {
> + disables &= ~REG_GENMASK8(1, 0);
> + disables |= REG_FIELD_PREP8(REG_GENMASK8(1, 0), 0x1);
> }
>
> - /* disable MLs */
> - intel_cx0_write(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(1, 2),
> - l0t1, MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
> - intel_cx0_write(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(2, 2),
> - l0t2, MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
> - intel_cx0_write(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE1, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(1, 2),
> - l1t1, MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
> - intel_cx0_write(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE1, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(2, 2),
> - l1t2, MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
> + /* TODO: DP-alt MFD case where only one PHY lane should be programmed. */
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + int tx = i % 2 + 1;
> + u8 lane_mask = i / 2 == 0 ? INTEL_CX0_LANE0 : INTEL_CX0_LANE1;
I'm just catching up on mails and quickly eyeballing stuff, but
i / 2 == 0
looks suspect.
BR,
Jani.
> +
> + intel_cx0_rmw(i915, port, lane_mask, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(tx, 2),
> + CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX,
> + disables & BIT(i) ? CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX : 0,
> + MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
> + }
>
> if (intel_is_c10phy(i915, intel_port_to_phy(i915, port)))
> intel_cx0_rmw(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_BOTH_LANES,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-31 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 21:27 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Fix C10/C20 implementation w.r.t. owned PHY lanes Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-25 21:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/cx0: Add intel_cx0_get_owned_lane_mask() Gustavo Sousa
2023-08-02 21:41 ` Taylor, Clinton A
2023-08-03 14:02 ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-08-08 10:43 ` Kahola, Mika
2023-07-25 21:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Simplify intel_cx0_program_phy_lane() with loop Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-31 11:04 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-07-31 12:58 ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-31 15:14 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-31 16:03 ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-25 21:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/cx0: Enable/disable TX only for owned PHY lanes Gustavo Sousa
2023-08-14 9:25 ` Kahola, Mika
2023-07-25 21:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/cx0: Program vswing only for owned lanes Gustavo Sousa
2023-08-14 9:27 ` Kahola, Mika
2023-07-25 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Fix C10/C20 implementation w.r.t. owned PHY lanes Patchwork
2023-07-26 4:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877cqgxryr.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox