From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions.
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:44:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d8nlbkr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321110305.12853-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
> Adding DP DSC register definitions, we might need for further
> DSC implementation, supporting MST and DP branch pass-through mode.
>
> v2: - Fixed checkpatch comment warning
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/dp/drm_dp_helper.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp.c
> index 703972ae14c6..45815745ba7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp.c
> @@ -2312,6 +2312,31 @@ u8 drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(const u8 dsc_dpcd[DP_DSC_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count);
>
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_dsc_sink_bpp_increment_div - Get the bits per pixel precision
> + * which DP DSC sink device supports.
> + */
> +u8 drm_dp_dsc_sink_bpp_increment_div(const u8 dsc_dpcd[DP_DSC_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> +{
> + u8 bpp_increment_dpcd = dsc_dpcd[DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_INC - DP_DSC_SUPPORT];
> +
> + switch (bpp_increment_dpcd) {
So I didn't look this up in the spec, but later in the patch you're
adding masks for the dpcd register in question, so I presume it's not
fine to assume the whole register is about bbp.
> + case DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_16:
> + return 16;
> + case DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_8:
> + return 8;
> + case DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_4:
> + return 4;
> + case DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_2:
> + return 2;
> + case DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_1:
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
Didn't checkpatch complain about the double newline?
You don't use the function for anything in patch 2. And you couldn't
because it's not exported to drivers.
BR,
Jani.
> /**
> * drm_dp_dsc_sink_line_buf_depth() - Get the line buffer depth in bits
> * @dsc_dpcd: DSC capabilities from DPCD
> diff --git a/include/drm/dp/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/dp/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 51e02cf75277..e4c9f4438ccb 100644
> --- a/include/drm/dp/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/dp/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ struct drm_panel;
>
> #define DP_DSC_SUPPORT 0x060 /* DP 1.4 */
> # define DP_DSC_DECOMPRESSION_IS_SUPPORTED (1 << 0)
> +# define DP_DSC_PASS_THROUGH_IS_SUPPORTED (1 << 1)
> +# define DP_DSC_DYNAMIC_PPS_UPDATE_SUPPORT_COMP_TO_COMP (1 << 2)
> +# define DP_DSC_DYNAMIC_PPS_UPDATE_SUPPORT_UNCOMP_TO_COMP (1 << 3)
>
> #define DP_DSC_REV 0x061
> # define DP_DSC_MAJOR_MASK (0xf << 0)
> @@ -284,12 +287,15 @@ struct drm_panel;
>
> #define DP_DSC_BLK_PREDICTION_SUPPORT 0x066
> # define DP_DSC_BLK_PREDICTION_IS_SUPPORTED (1 << 0)
> +# define DP_DSC_RGB_COLOR_CONV_BYPASS_SUPPORT (1 << 1)
>
> #define DP_DSC_MAX_BITS_PER_PIXEL_LOW 0x067 /* eDP 1.4 */
>
> #define DP_DSC_MAX_BITS_PER_PIXEL_HI 0x068 /* eDP 1.4 */
> # define DP_DSC_MAX_BITS_PER_PIXEL_HI_MASK (0x3 << 0)
> # define DP_DSC_MAX_BITS_PER_PIXEL_HI_SHIFT 8
> +# define DP_DSC_MAX_BPP_DELTA_VERSION_MASK 0x06
> +# define DP_DSC_MAX_BPP_DELTA_AVAILABILITY 0x08
>
> #define DP_DSC_DEC_COLOR_FORMAT_CAP 0x069
> # define DP_DSC_RGB (1 << 0)
> @@ -351,11 +357,13 @@ struct drm_panel;
> # define DP_DSC_24_PER_DP_DSC_SINK (1 << 2)
>
> #define DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_INC 0x06F
> +# define DP_DSC_RGB_YCbCr444_MAX_BPP_DELTA_MASK 0x1f
> +# define DP_DSC_RGB_YCbCr420_MAX_BPP_DELTA_MASK 0xe0
> # define DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_16 0x0
> # define DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_8 0x1
> # define DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_4 0x2
> # define DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_2 0x3
> -# define DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1 0x4
> +# define DP_DSC_BITS_PER_PIXEL_1_1 0x4
>
> #define DP_PSR_SUPPORT 0x070 /* XXX 1.2? */
> # define DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED 1
> @@ -1825,6 +1833,7 @@ u8 drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(const u8 dsc_dpcd[DP_DSC_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
> u8 drm_dp_dsc_sink_line_buf_depth(const u8 dsc_dpcd[DP_DSC_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]);
> int drm_dp_dsc_sink_supported_input_bpcs(const u8 dsc_dpc[DP_DSC_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
> u8 dsc_bpc[3]);
> +u8 drm_dp_dsc_sink_bpp_increment_div(const u8 dsc_dpcd[DP_DSC_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]);
>
> static inline bool
> drm_dp_sink_supports_dsc(const u8 dsc_dpcd[DP_DSC_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-21 11:03 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-21 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-21 12:44 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-03-21 14:08 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-21 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-21 18:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DP MST DSC support to i915 (rev3) Patchwork
2022-03-21 18:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-21 19:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-22 2:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-22 9:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-22 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-25 16:11 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2022-08-15 17:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-15 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-10 8:17 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-10 8:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-04-11 16:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-04-11 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-21 9:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-21 9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-17 16:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-17 16:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-17 16:25 Stanislav Lisovskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d8nlbkr.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox