From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:33:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e00p7n4.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304125118.12335-1-anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
On Wed, 04 Mar 2020, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
> Few edp panels like Sharp is triggering short and long
> hpd pulse after panel is getting powered off.
> Currently driver is already ignoring long pulse for eDP
> panel but in order to process the short pulse, it turns on
> the VDD which requires panel power_cycle_delay + panel_power_on_delay
> these delay on Sharp panel introduced the responsiveness overhead
> of 800ms in the modeset sequence and as well is in suspend
> sequence.
> Ignoring any short pulse once panel is powered off.
>
> FIXME: It requires to wait for panel_power_off_delay in order
> to check the panel status, as panel triggers short pulse immediately
> after writing PP_OFF to PP_CTRL register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 0a417cd2af2b..93de015f5322 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -6763,10 +6763,24 @@ static const struct drm_encoder_funcs intel_dp_enc_funcs = {
> .destroy = intel_dp_encoder_destroy,
> };
>
> +static bool is_edp_powered_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
We have a number of existing edp_ prefixed functions, with intel_
prefixed wrappers. Please make this intel_edp_have_panel_power(). Early
return false for non-eDP.
Also handle intel_dp_is_edp() in the caller so it's clear what's being
done.
> +{
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + bool powerd_off = false;
> +
> + if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> + with_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> + powerd_off = !edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp);
> + }
> +
> + return powerd_off;
> +}
> +
> enum irqreturn
> intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_dig_port->dp;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>
> if (long_hpd && intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) {
> /*
> @@ -6810,6 +6824,11 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
> if (!intel_dp->is_mst) {
> bool handled;
>
> + if (is_edp_powered_off(intel_dp)) {
I would move this to the beginning of the function in the same if
statement as the long_hpd handling:
if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
(long_hpd || !intel_edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp)))
But makes me wonder if that should be changed to ignore all hpd from eDP
if there's no panel power nor vdd. Ville?
> + drm_info(&i915->drm, "edp panel is off, ignoring the short pulse\n");
drm_dbg_kms() will be enough.
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +
> handled = intel_dp_short_pulse(intel_dp);
>
> if (!handled)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 12:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-04 13:33 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-03-04 18:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 3:17 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-09 8:50 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-13 18:47 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-04 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for " Patchwork
2020-03-04 17:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-05 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-03-13 18:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-17 17:54 ` Jani Nikula
2020-03-18 8:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] " Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-18 9:38 ` Jani Nikula
2020-03-23 8:35 ` Shankar, Uma
2020-03-16 15:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off (rev2) Patchwork
2020-03-16 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-03-18 9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off (rev3) Patchwork
2020-03-18 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877e00p7n4.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox