From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 22:19:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rkwefji.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221029044230.32128-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:42:30 -0700, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> index 9e9781493025..c588a17f97e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> @@ -101,21 +101,16 @@ hwm_field_read_and_scale(struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, i915_reg_t rgadr,
>
> static void
> hwm_field_scale_and_write(struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, i915_reg_t rgadr,
> - u32 field_msk, int nshift,
> - unsigned int scale_factor, long lval)
> + int nshift, unsigned int scale_factor, long lval)
> {
> u32 nval;
> - u32 bits_to_clear;
> - u32 bits_to_set;
>
> /* Computation in 64-bits to avoid overflow. Round to nearest. */
> nval = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)lval << nshift, scale_factor);
>
> - bits_to_clear = field_msk;
> - bits_to_set = FIELD_PREP(field_msk, nval);
> -
> hwm_locked_with_pm_intel_uncore_rmw(ddat, rgadr,
> - bits_to_clear, bits_to_set);
> + PKG_PWR_LIM_1,
> + REG_FIELD_PREP(PKG_PWR_LIM_1, nval));
I registered my objection to this patch already here:
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/87ilk7pwrw.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com/
the crux of which is "hwm_field_scale_and_write() pairs with
hwm_field_read_and_scale() (they are basically a set/get pair) so it is
desirable they have identical arguments. This patch breaks that symmetry".
We can merge this patch now but the moment a second caller of
hwm_field_scale_and_write arrives this patch will need to be reverted.
I have also posted my preferred way (as I previously indiecated) of fixing
this issue here (if this needs to be fixed in i915):
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/110301/
IMO it would be a mistake to use REG_FIELD_PREP or FIELD_PREP here since
here the mask comes in as a function argument whereas REG_FIELD_PREP and
FIELD_PREP require that mask to be a compile time constant.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-31 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 21:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-25 1:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-10-25 1:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-10-25 3:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-25 9:25 ` Andi Shyti
2022-10-25 16:46 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-25 18:45 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-26 0:18 ` Andi Shyti
2022-10-27 16:35 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-27 16:53 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-27 17:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-27 18:32 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-28 6:26 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-28 6:43 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-28 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-02 6:32 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-11-02 10:41 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-25 9:15 ` Andi Shyti
2022-10-25 14:27 ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-25 14:30 ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-25 18:46 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-27 17:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler (rev2) Patchwork
2022-10-28 6:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler (rev3) Patchwork
2022-10-28 6:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler (rev4) Patchwork
2022-10-29 4:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-31 5:19 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2022-10-31 6:37 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-10-31 17:31 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-01 10:35 ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-02 7:12 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-02 8:50 ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-29 5:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix a build error used with clang compiler (rev5) Patchwork
2022-10-29 5:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-10-29 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rkwefji.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox