From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915/hwmon: Add helper function to obtain energy values
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 14:12:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6455uan.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221130053427.2207600-3-riana.tauro@intel.com>
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:34:26 -0800, Riana Tauro wrote:
>
Hi Riana,
Mostly looks good but I have a little nit below.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> index c588a17f97e9..57d4e96d5c72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c
> @@ -442,6 +442,34 @@ hwm_energy_read(struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, u32 attr, long *val)
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * i915_hwmon_get_energy - obtains energy value
> + * @gt: intel_gt structure
> + * @energy: pointer to store energy in uJ
> + *
> + * This function checks for the validity of the underlying energy
> + * hardware register and obtains the per-gt/package level energy
Do we every use this function to find real package level energy? I don't
see it. I think what we mean here is that package level energy if there's
only one gt and gt level energy is not available, correct?
So I think we should make this explicit in the code below. Also change the
comment above to say only per-gt level energy.
> + * values.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -EOPNOTSUPP if register is invalid
> + */
> +int
> +i915_hwmon_get_energy(struct intel_gt *gt, long *energy)
> +{
> + struct i915_hwmon *hwmon = gt->i915->hwmon;
> + struct hwm_drvdata *ddat = &hwmon->ddat;
> + struct hwm_drvdata *ddat_gt = hwmon->ddat_gt + gt->info.id;
> +
> + if (hwm_energy_is_visible(ddat_gt, hwmon_energy_input))
> + hwm_energy(ddat_gt, energy);
> + else if (hwm_energy_is_visible(ddat, hwmon_energy_input))
So if we get here and we are finding gt level energy there must be only one
gt, correct?
So probably we need to do something like (maybe in intel_gt.h?):
static inline int intel_num_gt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_gt *gt;
int num_gt = 0, i;
for_each_gt(gt, i915, i)
num_gt++;
return num_gt;
}
And then the above check becomes:
else if (intel_num_gt() == 1 &&
hwm_energy_is_visible(ddat, hwmon_energy_input))
So this way we are basically always returning gt level energy from
i915_hwmon_get_energy.
If ever we need package level energy in the future we can add a new
function which takes a 'struct drm_i915_private *i915' arg (and uses
i915->hwmon->ddat).
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
> + hwm_energy(ddat, energy);
> + else
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static umode_t
> hwm_curr_is_visible(const struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, u32 attr)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.h
> index 7ca9cf2c34c9..1c38cfdbb7e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.h
> @@ -8,13 +8,16 @@
> #define __I915_HWMON_H__
>
> struct drm_i915_private;
> +struct intel_gt;
>
> #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_HWMON)
> void i915_hwmon_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> void i915_hwmon_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +int i915_hwmon_get_energy(struct intel_gt *gt, long *energy);
> #else
> static inline void i915_hwmon_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { };
> static inline void i915_hwmon_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { };
> +static inline int i915_hwmon_get_energy(struct intel_gt *gt, long *energy) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> #endif
>
> #endif /* __I915_HWMON_H__ */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-02 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-30 5:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/3] Add hwmon support for dgfx selftests Riana Tauro
2022-11-30 5:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/i915/selftests: Rename librapl library to libpower Riana Tauro
2022-12-02 22:13 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-30 5:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915/hwmon: Add helper function to obtain energy values Riana Tauro
2022-12-02 22:12 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2022-12-05 7:44 ` Tauro, Riana
2022-12-05 8:46 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-30 5:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/i915/selftests: Add hwmon support in libpower for dgfx Riana Tauro
2022-12-02 22:15 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-30 5:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add hwmon support for dgfx selftests (rev5) Patchwork
2022-11-30 5:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-11-30 6:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6455uan.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox