public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/rps: Freq caps for MTL
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 22:26:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a67axwqt.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87edwqb1mv.fsf@intel.com>

On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 02:40:08 -0700, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2022, Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> wrote:
> > For MTL, when reading from HW, RP0, RP1 (actuall RPe) and RPn freq use an
> > entirely different set of registers with different fields, bitwidths and
> > units.
> >
> > Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |  9 +++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> > index 579ae9ac089c..e7ab172698e3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> > @@ -1085,6 +1085,23 @@ static u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps)
> >		return intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void
> > +mtl_get_freq_caps(struct intel_rps *rps, struct intel_rps_freq_caps *caps)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps);
> > +	u32 rp_state_cap = rps_to_gt(rps)->type == GT_MEDIA ?
> > +				intel_uncore_read(uncore, MTL_MEDIAP_STATE_CAP) :
> > +				intel_uncore_read(uncore, MTL_RP_STATE_CAP);
> > +	u32 rpe = rps_to_gt(rps)->type == GT_MEDIA ?
> > +			intel_uncore_read(uncore, MTL_MPE_FREQUENCY) :
> > +			intel_uncore_read(uncore, MTL_GT_RPE_FREQUENCY);
> > +
> > +	/* MTL values are in units of 16.67 MHz */
> > +	caps->rp0_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_RP0_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap);
> > +	caps->min_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_RPN_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap);
> > +	caps->rp1_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_RPE_MASK, rpe);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * gen6_rps_get_freq_caps - Get freq caps exposed by HW
> >   * @rps: the intel_rps structure
> > @@ -1098,6 +1115,9 @@ void gen6_rps_get_freq_caps(struct intel_rps *rps, struct intel_rps_freq_caps *c
> >	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
> >	u32 rp_state_cap;
> >
> > +	if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915))
> > +		return mtl_get_freq_caps(rps, caps);
> > +
>
> Please make gen6_rps_get_freq_caps() static, and add
>
> intel_rps_get_freq_caps()
> {
>	if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915))
>		return mtl_get_freq_caps(rps, caps);
>	else
>		return gen6_rps_get_freq_caps(rps, caps);
> }
>
> Or something.

A general name like intel_rps_get_freq_caps name does not sit well with the
current code. intel_rps_get_freq_caps was actually used in earlier versions
of the patch:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/479179/?series=101606&rev=3

but was later changed to gen6_rps_get_freq_caps based on review
comments. Afaiu in i915 a name such as gen6_rps_get_freq_caps implies "Gen6
and later" and the gen6_rps_get_freq_caps name has actually proved quite
useful in reminding people that there are earlier/other generations not
covered by the function. See intel_rps_init.

Further the call stack is:

intel_rps_init -> gen6_rps_init -> gen6_rps_get_freq_caps

So it would look odd if we called intel_rps_get_freq_caps from
gen6_rps_init.

Therefore what I have done in v2 is:

s/gen6_rps_get_freq_caps/__gen6_rps_get_freq_caps/

and then

gen6_rps_get_freq_caps()
{
	if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915))
		return mtl_get_freq_caps(rps, caps);
	else
		return __gen6_rps_get_freq_caps(rps, caps);
}

Thanks.
--
Ashutosh

> >	rp_state_cap = intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps);
> >
> >	/* static values from HW: RP0 > RP1 > RPn (min_freq) */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 06d555321651..d78f9675aa57 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -1792,6 +1792,15 @@
> >  #define XEHPSDV_RP_STATE_CAP	_MMIO(0x250014)
> >  #define PVC_RP_STATE_CAP	_MMIO(0x281014)
> >
> > +#define MTL_RP_STATE_CAP	_MMIO(0x138000)
> > +#define MTL_MEDIAP_STATE_CAP	_MMIO(0x138020)
> > +#define   MTL_RP0_CAP_MASK	REG_GENMASK(8, 0)
> > +#define   MTL_RPN_CAP_MASK	REG_GENMASK(24, 16)
> > +
> > +#define MTL_GT_RPE_FREQUENCY	_MMIO(0x13800c)
> > +#define MTL_MPE_FREQUENCY	_MMIO(0x13802c)
> > +#define   MTL_RPE_MASK		REG_GENMASK(8, 0)
> > +
> >  #define GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS		_MMIO(0x1381a8)
> >  #define   GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS_MASK	0xde3
> >  #define   PROCHOT_MASK			REG_BIT(1)
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-08  5:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-02 23:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] i915: freq caps and perf_limit_reasons changes for MTL Ashutosh Dixit
2022-09-02 23:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Prepare more multi-GT initialization Ashutosh Dixit
2022-09-06 14:07   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-09-06 15:13     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-02 23:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Rename and expose common GT early init routine Ashutosh Dixit
2022-09-02 23:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/xelpmp: Expose media as another GT Ashutosh Dixit
2022-09-05  9:11   ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-06 15:14     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-02 23:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/debugfs: Add perf_limit_reasons in debugfs Ashutosh Dixit
2022-09-06 14:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-09-07  7:31     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-08  5:28     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-02 23:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/mtl: PERF_LIMIT_REASONS changes for MTL Ashutosh Dixit
2022-09-05  9:30   ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-08  5:27     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-02 23:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/rps: Freq caps " Ashutosh Dixit
2022-09-05  9:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-08  5:26     ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2022-09-03  0:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: freq caps and perf_limit_reasons changes " Patchwork
2022-09-03  0:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-09-03  0:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-09-03  2:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a67axwqt.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox