Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dg1: Read OPROM via SPI controller
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:11:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6h23teg.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214095600.47wfqodk4klpbyis@ldmartin-desk2>

On Tue, 14 Dec 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:42:41AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>On Fri, 17 Sep 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
>>> From: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Read OPROM SPI through MMIO and find VBT entry since we can't use
>>> OpRegion and PCI mapping may not work on some systems due to most BIOSes
>>> not leaving the Option ROM mapped.
>>
>>What happened here, still not merged? :o
>
> I don't understand neither. I got nacks, because of the other approach
> to get the VBT from opregion. In that case reading via spi
> controller directly would not be needed. However the other approach is
> still not applied and meanwhile DG1 and DG2 have to fallback to our fake
> vbt.
>
> So I actually think we should go ahead and just merge this.

Agreed.

This has been posted a few times with an accompanying "drm/i915/oprom:
Basic sanitization" patch [1]. I don't like the idea of posting a series
with one patch adding a function and the next one completely rewriting
the same function. However, cleanup of that combo has not happened, and
IIUC as a standalone patch this moves things forward and does no harm.

This seems to still apply fine. I've hit the retest button to get
current test results, and I suggest we merge this, and let's iterate
from there.


BR,
Jani.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210412090526.30547-15-matthew.auld@intel.com/


>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>>BR,
>>Jani.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h           |  8 +++
>>>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>>> index 3c25926092de..7f179dbdec1b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>>> @@ -2280,6 +2280,66 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size)
>>>  	return vbt;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static struct vbt_header *spi_oprom_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 count, data, found, store = 0;
>>> +	u32 static_region, oprom_offset;
>>> +	u32 oprom_size = 0x200000;
>>> +	u16 vbt_size;
>>> +	u32 *vbt;
>>> +
>>> +	static_region = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, SPI_STATIC_REGIONS);
>>> +	static_region &= OPTIONROM_SPI_REGIONID_MASK;
>>> +	intel_uncore_write(&i915->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_REGIONID, static_region);
>>> +
>>> +	oprom_offset = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, OROM_OFFSET);
>>> +	oprom_offset &= OROM_OFFSET_MASK;
>>> +
>>> +	for (count = 0; count < oprom_size; count += 4) {
>>> +		intel_uncore_write(&i915->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_ADDRESS, oprom_offset + count);
>>> +		data = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_TRIGGER);
>>> +
>>> +		if (data == *((const u32 *)"$VBT")) {
>>> +			found = oprom_offset + count;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (count >= oprom_size)
>>> +		goto err_not_found;
>>> +
>>> +	/* Get VBT size and allocate space for the VBT */
>>> +	intel_uncore_write(&i915->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_ADDRESS, found +
>>> +		   offsetof(struct vbt_header, vbt_size));
>>> +	vbt_size = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_TRIGGER);
>>> +	vbt_size &= 0xffff;
>>> +
>>> +	vbt = kzalloc(vbt_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!vbt) {
>>> +		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Unable to allocate %u bytes for VBT storage\n",
>>> +			vbt_size);
>>> +		goto err_not_found;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	for (count = 0; count < vbt_size; count += 4) {
>>> +		intel_uncore_write(&i915->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_ADDRESS, found + count);
>>> +		data = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_TRIGGER);
>>> +		*(vbt + store++) = data;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (!intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(vbt, vbt_size))
>>> +		goto err_free_vbt;
>>> +
>>> +	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Found valid VBT in SPI flash\n");
>>> +
>>> +	return (struct vbt_header *)vbt;
>>> +
>>> +err_free_vbt:
>>> +	kfree(vbt);
>>> +err_not_found:
>>> +	return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev);
>>> @@ -2329,6 +2389,8 @@ static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>
>>>  	pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
>>>
>>> +	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Found valid VBT in PCI ROM\n");
>>> +
>>>  	return vbt;
>>>
>>>  err_free_vbt:
>>> @@ -2363,17 +2425,23 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>
>>>  	init_vbt_defaults(i915);
>>>
>>> -	/* If the OpRegion does not have VBT, look in PCI ROM. */
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * If the OpRegion does not have VBT, look in SPI flash through MMIO or
>>> +	 * PCI mapping
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (!vbt && IS_DGFX(i915)) {
>>> +		oprom_vbt = spi_oprom_get_vbt(i915);
>>> +		vbt = oprom_vbt;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>  	if (!vbt) {
>>>  		oprom_vbt = oprom_get_vbt(i915);
>>> -		if (!oprom_vbt)
>>> -			goto out;
>>> -
>>>  		vbt = oprom_vbt;
>>> -
>>> -		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Found valid VBT in PCI ROM\n");
>>>  	}
>>>
>>> +	if (!vbt)
>>> +		goto out;
>>> +
>>>  	bdb = get_bdb_header(vbt);
>>>  	i915->vbt.version = bdb->version;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> index c3a21f7c003d..fd3fee090412 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> @@ -12771,6 +12771,14 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>>>  #define  TCSS_DDI_STATUS_HPD_LIVE_STATUS_TBT	REG_BIT(1)
>>>  #define  TCSS_DDI_STATUS_HPD_LIVE_STATUS_ALT	REG_BIT(0)
>>>
>>> +#define PRIMARY_SPI_TRIGGER			_MMIO(0x102040)
>>> +#define PRIMARY_SPI_ADDRESS			_MMIO(0x102080)
>>> +#define PRIMARY_SPI_REGIONID			_MMIO(0x102084)
>>> +#define SPI_STATIC_REGIONS			_MMIO(0x102090)
>>> +#define   OPTIONROM_SPI_REGIONID_MASK		REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
>>> +#define OROM_OFFSET				_MMIO(0x1020c0)
>>> +#define   OROM_OFFSET_MASK			REG_GENMASK(20, 16)
>>> +
>>>  /* This register controls the Display State Buffer (DSB) engines. */
>>>  #define _DSBSL_INSTANCE_BASE		0x70B00
>>>  #define DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id)	(_DSBSL_INSTANCE_BASE + \
>>
>>-- 
>>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-15 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-17 23:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dg1: Read OPROM via SPI controller Lucas De Marchi
2021-09-18  1:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-09-18  1:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-12-14  9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2021-12-14  9:56   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-12-15 13:11     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-12-15 13:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dg1: Read OPROM via SPI controller (rev2) Patchwork
2021-12-15 13:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-12-15 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-15 16:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a6h23teg.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox