From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:03:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6q2h57k.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210413051002.92589-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> Like was done for the display part that parted ways with INTEL_GEN(),
> replacing with DISPLAY_VER(), do a similar conversion for the rest of
> the driver.
>
> v1.1: Remove .ko that was incorrectly added as part of patch 11, making it
> very big and not going through the mailing list. Sorry for those in CC
> who received it.
>
> v2:
> - Add "drm/i915/display: rename display version macros" to rename
> macro and repurpose it: s/IS_DISPLAY_RANGE/IS_DISPLAY_VER/ and convert
> the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER to use direct comparison
> - Group display patches to easily apply independently
I like the direction here. Even as the version checks diversify, we
manage to simplify and reduce the macros.
I think we're going to have to queueu this via a topic branch, and merge
that to both drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next. The next time the
branches can sync up is just too far away at this point, and the
conflicts may be really nasty to solve later.
That does mean having to solve the conflict with 70bfb30743d5
("drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_GEN9_{BC,LP}") which is in din but not
dign. The topic branch would be based on:
$ git merge-base drm-intel/drm-intel-next drm-intel/drm-intel-gt-next
9c0fed84d5750e1eea6c664e073ffa2534a17743
There are two (crappy?) ideas to make that easier. 1) revert
70bfb30743d5 from din and add it to the topic branch instead, 2) don't
revert it but cherry-pick it to the topic branch also.
Cc: Joonas and Daniel for their input on this as well.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 5:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915/display: use DISPLAY_VER() on remaining users Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:24 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: rename display.version to display.ver Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:25 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915/display: rename display version macros Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:35 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915: add macros for graphics and media versions Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:33 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/gt: replace gen use in intel_engine_cs Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:36 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915/selftests: replace unused mask with simple version Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:36 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/selftests: eliminate use of gen_mask Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:38 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915: finish removal " Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:40 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-14 11:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-14 13:13 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-14 13:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-15 10:22 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-14 17:41 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 5:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915: eliminate remaining uses of intel_device_info->gen Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:43 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915: finish removal of gen from intel_device_info Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:45 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915: add media and display versions to device_info print Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:46 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915: split dgfx features from gen 12 Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 9:47 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-13 5:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver (rev3) Patchwork
2021-04-13 5:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-04-13 5:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-04-13 6:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-04-13 7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-04-13 10:03 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-04-14 8:08 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver Jani Nikula
2021-04-14 10:06 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-14 11:17 ` Joonas Lahtinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6q2h57k.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox