Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Bump the scheduling error threshold for fast heartbeats
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:00:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6tcltdi.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113144532.16979-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Since we are system_highpri_wq, we expected the heartbeat to be
> scheduled promptly. However, we see delays of over 10ms upsetting our
> assertions. Accept this as inevitable and bump the minimum error
> threshold to 20ms (from 6 jiffies).
>
> <6> [616.784749] rcs0: Heartbeat delay: 3570us [2802, 9188]
> <6> [616.807790] bcs0: Heartbeat delay: 2111us [745, 4372]
> <6> [616.853776] vcs0: Heartbeat delay: 6485us [2424, 11637]
> <3> [616.859296] vcs0: Heartbeat delay was 6485us, expected less than 6000us
> <3> [616.860901] i915/intel_heartbeat_live_selftests: live_heartbeat_fast failed with error -22
>
> v2: More context from CI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> index b88aa35ad75b..223ab88f7e57 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static int cmp_u32(const void *_a, const void *_b)
>  
>  static int __live_heartbeat_fast(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  {
> +	const unsigned int error_threshold = max(20000u, jiffies_to_usecs(6));
>  	struct intel_context *ce;
>  	struct i915_request *rq;
>  	ktime_t t0, t1;
> @@ -254,12 +255,18 @@ static int __live_heartbeat_fast(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  		times[0],
>  		times[ARRAY_SIZE(times) - 1]);
>  
> -	/* Min work delay is 2 * 2 (worst), +1 for scheduling, +1 for slack */
> -	if (times[ARRAY_SIZE(times) / 2] > jiffies_to_usecs(6)) {
> +	/*
> +	 * Ideally, the upper bound on min work delay would be something like
> +	 * 2 * 2 (worst), +1 for scheduling, +1 for slack. In practice, we
> +	 * are, even with system_wq_highpri, at the mercy of the CPU scheduler
> +	 * and may be stuck behind some slow work for many millisecond. Such
> +	 * as our very own display workers.
> +	 */
> +	if (times[ARRAY_SIZE(times) / 2] > error_threshold) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Heartbeat delay was %uus, expected less than %dus\n",
>  		       engine->name,
>  		       times[ARRAY_SIZE(times) / 2],
> -		       jiffies_to_usecs(6));
> +		       error_threshold);
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-13 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-13 12:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Bump the scheduling threshold for fast heartbeats Chris Wilson
2021-01-13 12:59 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-13 14:13   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-01-13 14:20     ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-13 14:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Bump the scheduling threshold for fast heartbeats (rev2) Patchwork
2021-01-13 14:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Bump the scheduling error threshold for fast heartbeats Chris Wilson
2021-01-13 16:00   ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2021-01-13 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/selftests: Bump the scheduling threshold for fast heartbeats (rev3) Patchwork
2021-01-13 19:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a6tcltdi.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox