Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/dsi: rename intel_dsi_pre_disable to intel_dsi_disable
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:18:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a88xebyx.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170306175846.rm23etm3r7baefwx@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:41:05PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:31:28PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > The hook names reflect more the phase in the mode set sequence the hooks
>> > are called in than what they actually do in terms of the specific
>> > encoder. Stick to that scheme, and rename intel_dsi_pre_disable to
>> > intel_dsi_disable. Unify the comments around this while at it. No
>> > functional changes.
>> > 
>> > Cc: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
>> > Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> > Cc: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe@intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
>> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > index 189b91478f8e..ebe1f55b20d6 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > @@ -840,21 +840,24 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> >  	intel_dsi_vbt_exec_sequence(intel_dsi, MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_ON);
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > +/*
>> > + * For DSI port enable has to be done before pipe and plane enable, so port
>> > + * enable is done in pre_enable phase unlike other encoders.
>> 
>> The "unlike other encoders" part is nonsense.
>
> We might want to go one step further even and make the hook optional and
> remove these few lines here ... Probably not worth it though.

I looked into it before, and decided it's better to keep intel_display.c
nice and clean, as most if not all other encoders provide the hook.

BR,
Jani.


> -Daniel
>> 
>> > + */
>> >  static void intel_dsi_enable_nop(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> >  				 struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>> >  				 struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
>> >  {
>> >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>> > -
>> > -	/* for DSI port enable has to be done before pipe
>> > -	 * and plane enable, so port enable is done in
>> > -	 * pre_enable phase itself unlike other encoders
>> > -	 */
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > -static void intel_dsi_pre_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> > -				  struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
>> > -				  struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state)
>> > +/*
>> > + * For DSI port disable has to be done after pipe and plane disable, so port
>> > + * disable is done in post_disable phase unlike other encoders.
>> > + */
>> > +static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> > +			      struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
>> > +			      struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state)
>> >  {
>> >  	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> > @@ -1730,7 +1733,7 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> >  	intel_encoder->compute_config = intel_dsi_compute_config;
>> >  	intel_encoder->pre_enable = intel_dsi_pre_enable;
>> >  	intel_encoder->enable = intel_dsi_enable_nop;
>> > -	intel_encoder->disable = intel_dsi_pre_disable;
>> > +	intel_encoder->disable = intel_dsi_disable;
>> >  	intel_encoder->post_disable = intel_dsi_post_disable;
>> >  	intel_encoder->get_hw_state = intel_dsi_get_hw_state;
>> >  	intel_encoder->get_config = intel_dsi_get_config;
>> > -- 
>> > 2.1.4
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ville Syrjälä
>> Intel OTC
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-07  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-06 14:31 [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dsi: stop using drm_panel, refactor Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 14:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/dsi: remove support for more than one panel driver Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 14:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/dsi: call vbt_panel_get_modes directly instead of via drm_panel Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 14:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/dsi: stop using the drm_panel framework completely Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 14:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/dsi: rename intel_dsi_exec_vbt_sequence to intel_dsi_vbt_exec_sequence Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 17:56   ` Daniel Vetter
2017-03-06 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/dsi: rename intel_dsi_pre_disable to intel_dsi_disable Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 14:41   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-03-06 16:00     ` Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 17:58     ` Daniel Vetter
2017-03-07  8:18       ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-03-07  9:24   ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 14:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/dsi: rename intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c to intel_dsi_vbt.c Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 14:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/dsi: arrange intel_dsi.h according to relevant files Jani Nikula
2017-03-06 15:29 ` [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dsi: stop using drm_panel, refactor Hans de Goede
2017-03-06 16:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-03-06 19:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] " Bob Paauwe
2017-03-07  9:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dsi: stop using drm_panel, refactor (rev2) Patchwork
2017-03-07 13:24 ` [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dsi: stop using drm_panel, refactor Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a88xebyx.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox