Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/displayid: use primary use case to figure out non-desktop

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 2/21/23 19:29, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 2/20/23 18:44, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> On 2/16/23 23:44, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>> Mostly this is prep work and plumbing for easier use of displayid
>>>> structure version and primary use case for parsing the displayid blocks,
>>>> but it can be nicely used for figuring out non-desktop too.
>>>>
>>>> Completely untested. :)
>>>>
>>>> BR,
>>>> Jani.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Iaroslav Boliukin <iam@lach.pw>
>>>> Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
>>>>
>>>> Jani Nikula (4):
>>>>   drm/displayid: add displayid_get_header() and check bounds better
>>>>   drm/displayid: return struct displayid_header from
>>>>     validate_displayid()
>>>>   drm/displayid: provide access to DisplayID version and primary use
>>>>     case
>>>>   drm/edid: update non-desktop use also from DisplayID
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_displayid.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c      | 25 +++++++++++++
>>>>  include/drm/drm_displayid.h     | 12 ++++++-
>>>>  3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> It works now without the EDID quirk, thanks!
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
>>>
>> 
>> I'm going to apply this to misc-next later this week if there won't be
>> any objections.
>> 
>
> Applied all 5 patches to misc-next

Thanks for the review and pushing!

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center