From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dpio: Fix VLV DPIO PLL register dword numbering
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:41:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cyqhvinn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422083457.23815-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> The spreadsheet defines the PLL register block as having
> the dwords in the following order:
>
> block dwords offsets
> PLL1 0x0-0x7 0x00-0x1f
> PLL2 0x0-0x7 0x20-0x2f
> PLL1ext 0x10-0x1f 0x40-0x5f
> PLL2ext 0x10-0x1f 0x60-0x7f
>
> So dword indexes 0x8-0xf don't even exist. Renumber
> our register defines to match.
>
> Note that the spreadsheet used hex numbering whereas our
> defiens are in decimal. Perhaps we should change that?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
I am, again, taking your word for it, instead of going on a wild goose
chase trying to find all the specs. The patch matches the commit
message,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c | 18 ++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 24 +++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> index 7e8aca3c87ec..b95032651da0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> @@ -1875,19 +1875,19 @@ static void vlv_pllb_recal_opamp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> * PLLB opamp always calibrates to max value of 0x3f, force enable it
> * and set it to a reasonable value instead.
> */
> - reg_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW9(1));
> + reg_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW17(1));
> reg_val &= 0xffffff00;
> reg_val |= 0x00000030;
> - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW9(1), reg_val);
> + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW17(1), reg_val);
>
> reg_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, phy, VLV_REF_DW11);
> reg_val &= 0x00ffffff;
> reg_val |= 0x8c000000;
> vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_REF_DW11, reg_val);
>
> - reg_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW9(1));
> + reg_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW17(1));
> reg_val &= 0xffffff00;
> - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW9(1), reg_val);
> + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW17(1), reg_val);
>
> reg_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, phy, VLV_REF_DW11);
> reg_val &= 0x00ffffff;
> @@ -1923,9 +1923,9 @@ static void vlv_prepare_pll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PCS_DW17_BCAST, 0x0100000f);
>
> /* Disable target IRef on PLL */
> - reg_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW8(pipe));
> + reg_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW16(pipe));
> reg_val &= 0x00ffffff;
> - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW8(pipe), reg_val);
> + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW16(pipe), reg_val);
>
> /* Disable fast lock */
> vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_CMN_DW0, 0x610);
> @@ -1951,10 +1951,10 @@ static void vlv_prepare_pll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> if (crtc_state->port_clock == 162000 ||
> intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_ANALOG) ||
> intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI))
> - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW10(pipe),
> + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW18(pipe),
> 0x009f0003);
> else
> - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW10(pipe),
> + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW18(pipe),
> 0x00d0000f);
>
> if (intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(crtc_state)) {
> @@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@ static void vlv_prepare_pll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> coreclk |= 0x01000000;
> vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW7(pipe), coreclk);
>
> - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW11(pipe), 0x87871000);
> + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, phy, VLV_PLL_DW19(pipe), 0x87871000);
>
> vlv_dpio_put(dev_priv);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 8f3c83d2ab8d..747221f8ac72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -229,21 +229,21 @@
> #define _VLV_PLL_DW7_CH1 0x803c
> #define VLV_PLL_DW7(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW7_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW7_CH1)
>
> -#define _VLV_PLL_DW8_CH0 0x8040
> -#define _VLV_PLL_DW8_CH1 0x8060
> -#define VLV_PLL_DW8(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW8_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW8_CH1)
> +#define _VLV_PLL_DW16_CH0 0x8040
> +#define _VLV_PLL_DW16_CH1 0x8060
> +#define VLV_PLL_DW16(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW16_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW16_CH1)
>
> -#define _VLV_PLL_DW9_CH0 0x8044
> -#define _VLV_PLL_DW9_CH1 0x8064
> -#define VLV_PLL_DW9(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW9_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW9_CH1)
> +#define _VLV_PLL_DW17_CH0 0x8044
> +#define _VLV_PLL_DW17_CH1 0x8064
> +#define VLV_PLL_DW17(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW17_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW17_CH1)
>
> -#define _VLV_PLL_DW10_CH0 0x8048
> -#define _VLV_PLL_DW10_CH1 0x8068
> -#define VLV_PLL_DW10(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW10_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW10_CH1)
> +#define _VLV_PLL_DW18_CH0 0x8048
> +#define _VLV_PLL_DW18_CH1 0x8068
> +#define VLV_PLL_DW18(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW18_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW18_CH1)
>
> -#define _VLV_PLL_DW11_CH0 0x804c
> -#define _VLV_PLL_DW11_CH1 0x806c
> -#define VLV_PLL_DW11(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW11_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW11_CH1)
> +#define _VLV_PLL_DW19_CH0 0x804c
> +#define _VLV_PLL_DW19_CH1 0x806c
> +#define VLV_PLL_DW19(ch) _PIPE(ch, _VLV_PLL_DW19_CH0, _VLV_PLL_DW19_CH1)
>
> /* Spec for ref block start counts at DW8 */
> #define VLV_REF_DW11 0x80ac
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 8:34 [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: VLV/CHV DPIO register cleanup Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/dpio: Remove pointless VLV_PCS01_DW8 read Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 8:58 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/dpio: s/VLV_REF_DW13/VLV_REF_DW11/ Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 9:01 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/dpio: s/VLV_PLL_DW9_BCAST/VLV_PCS_DW17_BCAST/ Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 9:02 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dpio: Fix VLV DPIO PLL register dword numbering Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 9:41 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/dpio: Remove pointless variables from vlv/chv DPLL code Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/dpio: Rename some variables Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 9:56 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/dpio: s/port/ch/ Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 9:59 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dpio: s/pipe/ch/ Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 10:02 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/dpio: Derive the phy from the port rather than pipe in encoder hooks Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-23 8:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-04-23 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/dpio: Give VLV DPIO group register a clearer name Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 10:12 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dpio: Rename a few CHV DPIO PHY registers Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 10:16 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/dpio: Clean up VLV/CHV DPIO PHY register defines Ville Syrjala
2024-04-23 9:18 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/dpio: Clean up the vlv/chv PHY register bits Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 12:46 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-23 7:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-04-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/dpio: Extract vlv_dpio_phy_regs.h Ville Syrjala
2024-04-22 12:50 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-22 10:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: VLV/CHV DPIO register cleanup Patchwork
2024-04-22 10:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-26 10:19 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-30 11:43 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: VLV/CHV DPIO register cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-30 11:43 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-04-30 11:49 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-30 15:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cyqhvinn.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox