From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Mikko Kovanen <mikko.kovanen@aavamobile.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: fix VBT send packet port selection for dual link DSI
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:56:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cz963wyg.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tu2j4ehb.fsf@intel.com>
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2022, Mikko Kovanen <mikko.kovanen@aavamobile.com> wrote:
>> intel_dsi->ports contains bitmask of enabled ports and correspondingly
>> logic for selecting port for VBT packet sending must use port specific
>> bitmask when deciding appropriate port.
>>
>> Fixes: 08c59dde71b7 ("drm/i915/dsi: fix VBT send packet port selection for ICL+")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Mikko Kovanen <mikko.kovanen@aavamobile.com>
>
> Holy crap, that's embarrassing! Thanks!
>
> Despite the mistake, it always works for single-link DSI as well as port
> A on dual-link DSI, which probably covers most use cases. It's the
> commands targeted at port B (VLV+ DSI) or port C (ICL+ DSI) that go
> haywire.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Pushed to drm-intel-next, thanks for the patch.
And promptly after pushing I realized I failed to added the link to the
issue in the commit message. Here it is for posterity:
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7601
BR,
Jani.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
>> index 75e8cc4337c9..fce69fa446d5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
>> @@ -137,9 +137,9 @@ static enum port intel_dsi_seq_port_to_port(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
>> return ffs(intel_dsi->ports) - 1;
>>
>> if (seq_port) {
>> - if (intel_dsi->ports & PORT_B)
>> + if (intel_dsi->ports & BIT(PORT_B))
>> return PORT_B;
>> - else if (intel_dsi->ports & PORT_C)
>> + else if (intel_dsi->ports & BIT(PORT_C))
>> return PORT_C;
>> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-26 13:27 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: fix VBT send packet port selection for dual link DSI Mikko Kovanen
2022-11-26 14:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for " Patchwork
2022-11-26 14:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-28 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2022-11-29 9:56 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-26 13:00 Mikko Kovanen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cz963wyg.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mikko.kovanen@aavamobile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox