Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:19:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0b3d5os.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200128135425.14596-2-anshuman.gupta@intel.com>

On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
> Content Protection property should be updated as per the kernel
> internal state. Let's say if Content protection is disabled
> by userspace, CP property should be set to UNDESIRED so that
> reauthentication will not happen until userspace request it again,
> but when kernel disables the HDCP due to any DDI disabling sequences
> like modeset/DPMS operation, kernel should set the property to
> DESIRED, so that when opportunity arises, kernel will start the
> HDCP authentication on its own.
>
> Somewhere in the line, state machine to set content protection to
> DESIRED from kernel was broken and IGT coverage was missing for it.
> This patch fixes it.
> IGT patch to catch further regression on this features is being
> worked upon.
>
> CC: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  4 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c    | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h    |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index da5266e76738..934cdf1f1858 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -14595,6 +14595,10 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		goto fail;
>  
>  	if (any_ms) {
> +		/*
> +		 * When there is modeset fix the hdcp uapi CP state.
> +		 */
> +		intel_hdcp_post_need_modeset_check(state);
>  		ret = intel_modeset_checks(state);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto fail;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> index 0fdbd39f6641..be083136eee2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -2074,6 +2074,32 @@ void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  	crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * intel_hdcp_post_need_modeset_check.
> + * @state: intel atomic state.
> + *
> + * This function fix the HDCP uapi state when hdcp disabling initiated from
> + * modeset DDI disabling sequence. It updates uapi CP state from ENABLED to
> + * DESIRED so that HDCP uapi state can be restored as per HDCP Auth state.
> + * This function should be called only in case of in case of modeset.
> + * FIXME: As per HDCP content protection property uapi doc, an uevent()
> + * need to be sent if there is transition from ENABLED->DESIRED.
> + */
> +void intel_hdcp_post_need_modeset_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct drm_connector *connector;
> +	struct drm_connector_state *old_state;
> +	struct drm_connector_state *new_state;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for_each_oldnew_connector_in_state(&state->base, connector, old_state,
> +					   new_state, i) {
> +		if (old_state->content_protection == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
> +		    new_state->content_protection != DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED)
> +			new_state->content_protection = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED;
> +	}
> +}
> +

Why does this feel like duplication of what you already have in
intel_hdcp_atomic_check()?

BR,
Jani.


>  /* Handles the CP_IRQ raised from the DP HDCP sink */
>  void intel_hdcp_handle_cp_irq(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> index f3c3272e712a..7bf46bc3c348 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  struct drm_connector;
>  struct drm_connector_state;
>  struct drm_i915_private;
> +struct intel_atomic_state;
>  struct intel_connector;
>  struct intel_hdcp_shim;
>  enum port;
> @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ enum transcoder;
>  void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  			     struct drm_connector_state *old_state,
>  			     struct drm_connector_state *new_state);
> +void intel_hdcp_post_need_modeset_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
>  int intel_hdcp_init(struct intel_connector *connector,
>  		    const struct intel_hdcp_shim *hdcp_shim);
>  int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector *connector,

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-28 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-28 13:54 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] HDCP Misc series Anshuman Gupta
2020-01-28 13:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state Anshuman Gupta
2020-01-28 14:19   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-01-28 15:44     ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-01-28 16:15       ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-02-05  5:07         ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-03 14:36           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-03-03 16:35             ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-03-04  8:43               ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-03-05  5:56                 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-01-28 13:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: HDCP support on above PORT_E Anshuman Gupta
2020-01-28 14:20   ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-28 14:21     ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-29 13:26   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Anshuman Gupta
2020-02-07 14:03     ` Ramalingam C
2020-01-28 13:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: debugfs info print "HDCP shim isn't available" Anshuman Gupta
2020-02-07 14:13   ` Ramalingam C
2020-01-28 13:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Add HDCP2.2 capable debug print Anshuman Gupta
2020-01-28 14:23   ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-07 14:16   ` Ramalingam C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d0b3d5os.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox