Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use single point of truth for PPS divisor register
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:35:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0n17g5g.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190305202254.GS10303@intel.com>

On Tue, 05 Mar 2019, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 03:52:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Set pp_div field of struct pps_registers to INVALID_MMIO_REG when the
>> register isn't there, and use i915_mmio_reg_valid() instead of repeating
>> the condition all over the place.
>> 
>> Use INVALID_MMIO_REG explicitly for documentation purposes, even if the
>> value is unchanged from 0.
>
> great clean up. Thanks for that.
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Thanks for the reviews, pushed to dinq.

BR,
Jani.

>
>
>
>> 
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index e0f421e76305..f40b3342d82a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -949,8 +949,12 @@ static void intel_pps_get_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  	regs->pp_stat = PP_STATUS(pps_idx);
>>  	regs->pp_on = PP_ON_DELAYS(pps_idx);
>>  	regs->pp_off = PP_OFF_DELAYS(pps_idx);
>> -	if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv) &&
>> -	    !HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv))
>> +
>> +	/* Cycle delay moved from PP_DIVISOR to PP_CONTROL */
>> +	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv) ||
>> +	    HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv))
>> +		regs->pp_div = INVALID_MMIO_REG;
>> +	else
>>  		regs->pp_div = PP_DIVISOR(pps_idx);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -6420,7 +6424,7 @@ static void
>>  intel_pps_readout_hw_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct edp_power_seq *seq)
>>  {
>>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>> -	u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div = 0, pp_ctl = 0;
>> +	u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_ctl;
>>  	struct pps_registers regs;
>>  
>>  	intel_pps_get_registers(intel_dp, &regs);
>> @@ -6433,10 +6437,6 @@ intel_pps_readout_hw_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct edp_power_seq *seq)
>>  
>>  	pp_on = I915_READ(regs.pp_on);
>>  	pp_off = I915_READ(regs.pp_off);
>> -	if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv) &&
>> -	    !HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv)) {
>> -		pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_div);
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	/* Pull timing values out of registers */
>>  	seq->t1_t3 = (pp_on & PANEL_POWER_UP_DELAY_MASK) >>
>> @@ -6451,13 +6451,17 @@ intel_pps_readout_hw_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct edp_power_seq *seq)
>>  	seq->t10 = (pp_off & PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_MASK) >>
>>  		   PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT;
>>  
>> -	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv) ||
>> -	    HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv)) {
>> +	if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(regs.pp_div)) {
>> +		u32 pp_div;
>> +
>> +		pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_div);
>> +
>> +		seq->t11_t12 = ((pp_div & PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
>> +				PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) * 1000;
>> +
>> +	} else {
>>  		seq->t11_t12 = ((pp_ctl & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
>>  				BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) * 1000;
>> -	} else {
>> -		seq->t11_t12 = ((pp_div & PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
>> -		       PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) * 1000;
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -6582,7 +6586,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  					      bool force_disable_vdd)
>>  {
>>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>> -	u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div, port_sel = 0;
>> +	u32 pp_on, pp_off, port_sel = 0;
>>  	int div = dev_priv->rawclk_freq / 1000;
>>  	struct pps_registers regs;
>>  	enum port port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.port;
>> @@ -6621,19 +6625,6 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  		(seq->t8 << PANEL_LIGHT_ON_DELAY_SHIFT);
>>  	pp_off = (seq->t9 << PANEL_LIGHT_OFF_DELAY_SHIFT) |
>>  		 (seq->t10 << PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT);
>> -	/* Compute the divisor for the pp clock, simply match the Bspec
>> -	 * formula. */
>> -	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv) ||
>> -	    HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv)) {
>> -		pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl);
>> -		pp_div &= ~BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK;
>> -		pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)
>> -				<< BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
>> -	} else {
>> -		pp_div = ((100 * div)/2 - 1) << PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
>> -		pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)
>> -				<< PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	/* Haswell doesn't have any port selection bits for the panel
>>  	 * power sequencer any more. */
>> @@ -6660,19 +6651,33 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  
>>  	I915_WRITE(regs.pp_on, pp_on);
>>  	I915_WRITE(regs.pp_off, pp_off);
>> -	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv) ||
>> -	    HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv))
>> -		I915_WRITE(regs.pp_ctrl, pp_div);
>> -	else
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Compute the divisor for the pp clock, simply match the Bspec formula.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(regs.pp_div)) {
>> +		u32 pp_div;
>> +
>> +		pp_div = ((100 * div) / 2 - 1) << PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
>> +		pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000) <<
>> +			   PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
>>  		I915_WRITE(regs.pp_div, pp_div);
>> +	} else {
>> +		u32 pp_ctl;
>> +
>> +		pp_ctl = I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl);
>> +		pp_ctl &= ~BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK;
>> +		pp_ctl |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000) <<
>> +			   BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
>> +		I915_WRITE(regs.pp_ctrl, pp_ctl);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("panel power sequencer register settings: PP_ON %#x, PP_OFF %#x, PP_DIV %#x\n",
>>  		      I915_READ(regs.pp_on),
>>  		      I915_READ(regs.pp_off),
>> -		      (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)  ||
>> -		       HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv)) ?
>> -		      (I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl) & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) :
>> -		      I915_READ(regs.pp_div));
>> +		      i915_mmio_reg_valid(regs.pp_div) ?
>> +		      I915_READ(regs.pp_div) :
>> +		      (I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl) & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK));
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void intel_dp_pps_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-08 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-05 13:52 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: deconflate PPS unlock from divisor register Jani Nikula
2019-03-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use single point of truth for PPS " Jani Nikula
2019-03-05 20:17   ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-05 20:22   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2019-03-08 11:35     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-03-05 14:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: deconflate PPS unlock from " Patchwork
2019-03-05 16:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-03-05 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Rodrigo Vivi
2019-03-06  8:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: deconflate PPS unlock from divisor register (rev2) Patchwork
2019-03-06 10:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: deconflate PPS unlock from divisor register (rev3) Patchwork
2019-03-06 15:06 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d0n17g5g.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox